Physics or Chemistry first?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

acamus

New Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2013
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I am contemplating which class should be taken first. This question is more of a philosophical question what do you guys think?

Members don't see this ad.
 
Hi all,

I am contemplating which class should be taken first. This question is more of a philosophical question what do you guys think?

It really doesn't matter. Either one is okay or do both. Just make sure you're dedicated to it and not get weeded out.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
It makes more sense to learn physics first and then apply the concepts in learning chemistry, but if you're like most students at most schools (including me) you won't actually learn the material in enough depth to make those connections and it won't matter.
 
I took Chemistry and Physics at the same time. Meh. Made no difference, but it cleared room for more classes my second year.
 
I'm trying to think of specific situations where learning one first would benefit you. Three things came to mind immediately that would suggest physics first for a slight advantage. Make sure you check course prerequisites in case your school goes into more depth than expected.

-Batteries, Galvanic Cells, Electrolytic Cells, ions in solution = Physics first to understand currents, anodes, cathodes, electrons versus positive charges
-Thermodynamics and bomb calorimeters - Physics first for energy equations, potential, kinetic, heat
-Chemistry experiments involving release of light - physics first to understand wavelengths of light
 
My guess is, all else equal for someone (more like assuming tabular rasa), that if you do physics->chemistry, you'll tend to approach chemistry the teensy more mathematically and if you do chemistry->physics, you'll tend to approach physics more bit more conceptually.

But in real life -- at the university level after we've all had 12 years of education to develop our own styles -- it probably depends more on what kind of problem solver you are to start with. I was always more math-oriented so approached all chemistry problems as a set of equations to be solved, while I had friends who liked to think about the forces at play theoretically first to parse a question, even when doing mechanics.
 
I was talking about this with my high school science teacher the other day! I think, hypothetically, it makes more sense for physics to be first -- it's generally easier to understand micro examples if you are taught it on a macro scale first.

However, physics requires a lot more math than general chemistry or any intro science classes. Thus if you are not interested in math, you might get turned off of science by having your first science class be quite math oriented. This is an example primarily relevant to high school curriculum, but still.
 
I took chemistry first, and I think thats a good idea. Physics is more difficult, so warming up to gen chem I and II before physics helps.
 
Either. Took them simultaneously.
 
Conceptually physics should come first, like most other posters mentioned.

Realistically you to have to take chem (one year) and ochem (one year) so it makes sense to take chem your first year. You could take physics at the same time but it won't make a significant impact...
 
Would it be correct to say you've finished the bio prereqs already? Practically speaking, I think taking chemistry (I assume it's general chemistry you're referring to) first would be best. This is because general chemistry is usually a requirement for organic chemistry, so if you take general chemistry this year, you have the option of taking physics along with organic next year if you so choose, allowing you to finish your prereqs in 4 semesters. Whereas if you take physics this year, and general chemistry next year, you can only take orgo the year after that, meaning you'll need 6 semesters to finish your prereqs.
 
Would it be correct to say you've finished the bio prereqs already? Practically speaking, I think taking chemistry (I assume it's general chemistry you're referring to) first would be best. This is because general chemistry is usually a requirement for organic chemistry, so if you take general chemistry this year, you have the option of taking physics along with organic next year if you so choose, allowing you to finish your prereqs in 4 semesters. Whereas if you take physics this year, and general chemistry next year, you can only take orgo the year after that, meaning you'll need 6 semesters to finish your prereqs.

Or you can take both gen chem and physics at the same time...
 
Most people take chemistry first but I'd take physics. I teach MCAT PS for what it's worth.
 
Or you can take both gen chem and physics at the same time...
Certainly, but since acamus was asking whether or not he/she should take physics or chemistry, not physics and chemistry, I assumed the latter wasn't an option for him/her.
 
I'm trying to think of specific situations where learning one first would benefit you. Three things came to mind immediately that would suggest physics first for a slight advantage. Make sure you check course prerequisites in case your school goes into more depth than expected.

-Batteries, Galvanic Cells, Electrolytic Cells, ions in solution = Physics first to understand currents, anodes, cathodes, electrons versus positive charges
-Thermodynamics and bomb calorimeters - Physics first for energy equations, potential, kinetic, heat
-Chemistry experiments involving release of light - physics first to understand wavelengths of light

It seems from your statement that E&M is more important than mechanics, this is interesting information I'll make sure to take note.
 
Chemistry first. If the physics is calculus based, make sure you have a good grasp on the calculus.
 
Top