8
837498
[deleted]
Last edited by a moderator:
A PI LOR Is NOT requiredThanks for the advice 🙂 I don’t mean to be a prick, but how do I move on from this? Wont adcoms wonder why I worked in a lab for 2 years and got published there but don’t have a letter from that pi?
Wouldn't MD PhD programs want a research related letter? Or is that just another false premed advisor claim.A PI LOR Is NOT required
The post doc told me that he said “I hear you’ve lost [my name]. I guess that’s one less letter for me to write” He said something of that accord which is surprising since I didn’t tell him I was leaving. Just that I had considered it and wanted his opinion!
You are right though. I guess it’s not 100 percent certain. I do plan on meeting with him and mentioning that I heard this (along with officially telling him I’m leaving) and I will ask for him to reconsider based on the time I have given him.
Good question. I can only advise on the MD or DOP track. OP didn't mention anything about wanting MD/phD.Wouldn't MD PhD programs want a research related letter? Or is that just another false premed advisor claim.
Good question. I can only advise on the MD or DOP track. OP didn't mention anything about wanting MD/phD.
But allow me to share an insight with you. When I was applying for NIH post-doctoral training grants, there was no requirement for a LOR from one graduate PI. That's because people realize that not everyone has a great relationship with their PIs.
I also agree that the OP needs to hear this from the PI himself. And at this point, since the bridges appear to have been burned, I worry that the PI will write a bad LOR, or simply refuse to write one.
Goro,
With a bit of common sense and good social intuition, would it hurt to ask and see a reaction? He is not compelled to submit any letter. You said “appear”. Hearsay is hearsay. No one wants years of work and a good relationship to die.
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
Did you not see that I wrote: "I also agree that the OP needs to hear this from the PI himself. "
???
With his attitude, I would probably just let it slide and not ask him for a letter at all. If he's that petty, there's the real risk that he won't write you a good one. A bad letter would be worse than no letter at all.Thank you all for the replies.... it is hearsay at this point and one of my premed friends thinks I’m overreacting and he’ll still write a letter in the end, which is definitely possible and what I hope for! On the other hand, he is a competitive guy and I’m worried I totally offended him. Honestly not sure how, I tried to act in the most respectful way regarding the matter. Haha I guess I’m almost a bit flattered he got so flustered by this. My opinion going to the convo was that he runs a big lab and won’t really care if an undergrad leaves because he’s got bigger fish to fry.
Am I being crazy? I feel like undergrad lab switches are a pretty common thing.... first time I’ve ever done one at least.
Anyways, I’ll probably meet him sometime next week. Maybe it was an emotional reaction and some time will help.
Good question. I can only advise on the MD or DOP track. OP didn't mention anything about wanting MD/phD.
But allow me to share an insight with you. When I was applying for NIH post-doctoral training grants, there was no requirement for a LOR from one graduate PI. That's because people realize that not everyone has a great relationship with their PIs.
I also agree that the OP needs to hear this from the PI himself. And at this point, since the bridges appear to have been burned, I worry that the PI will write a bad LOR, or simply refuse to write one.
Academic science is more politics than anything else these days. If your PI is a big name, it will get you places regardless what they’re actually like.Your PI behaves extremely unprofessional. I’d initially have thought about his human qualities and just out of principle would not have worked in his lab
That’s what happens most of the time if you’re not directly working with the PI. The OP’s situation seems to be that the PI might not want to sign off.Can the post doc write your letter and have your PI sign off on it?????
You should ask him directly. DO NOT mention that you overheard him telling the post-doc he might not write one. Just go in and ask nicely if he would be willing to write you a strong LOR. One possibility I see is that he is not super familiar with the med school admissions process and thinks that if you leave, you won’t want or need a letter from someone whose lab you are not currently working in.The post doc told me that he said “I hear you’ve lost [my name]. I guess that’s one less letter for me to write” He said something of that accord which is surprising since I didn’t tell him I was leaving. Just that I had considered it and wanted his opinion!
You are right though. I guess it’s not 100 percent certain. I do plan on meeting with him and mentioning that I heard this (along with officially telling him I’m leaving) and I will ask for him to reconsider based on the time I have given him.
Ooopps, my bad and my apologiesActually at the end they said as "as someone who is considering an MD/PhD" lol but that's good to know that it's not too important regardless. I thought I had a good relationship with the people in my lab but recently feels a little strained so I wouldn't feel comfortable asking anyone for a letter (PI is great but don't know him that well as he's not there too often).
What worries me about the situation is that even if the OP can get a letter, will it be a good one?Applying MDPHD, not having a letter from a PI you worked with for 2 years and have publications with is a HUGE red flag sign (someone who is successful this cycle applying MDPHD). This is from talking to several ADCOMs regarding not being able to get letter from a summer research experience. You need to talk to your PI and ask about the letter, and if he ask no, have a conversation with him about why not. If he is willing to write you one if you stay, I high recommend you stick it out because you are applying this cycle. Learning new technique is not with it. I also recommend asking this in the MDPHD forum, research LOR is held to the same level of importance as stats in MDPHD applications.
You would think that someone who is a Nobel laureate would actually be a decent human being and not a petty ass.
yeah even when people left our lab just to finish, postdocs never took it well.What worries me about the situation is that even if the OP can get a letter, will it be a good one?
OP we'll need to ask can he get a good letter of recommendation for his application to medical school?
And to add an edit, I would also be pissed off if my student of 2 years suddenly decided to switch to the lab of my competitor.
Just because scientists may be smart people, it doesn't mean that they are not human beings, and subject to the foibles we all have.
Why didn't you ask him for a letter first then leave....
hey just curious. youre not in LA area are you?
Yep that’s what I’m hoping for! I’ll probably mention that I would like to switch labs for x y and z reasons. But that I really enjoyed the experience in his lab. Then I will ask if he would still write me a strong LoR for this coming cycle. Like you guys said maybe I should not mention any hearsay. Sound good?
My only concern is that that makes him more angry and makes him feel more validated in his position.
no. for MD/PhD, a mentor letter is meaningless and not acceptable without PI signing off. You can get the letter from post-doc, but the PI must sign off on it.yeah even when people left our lab just to finish, postdocs never took it well.
it's a sizable investment at least thats how they see it and i think it goes both ways. so being human I could see it.
if OP worked with a grad student or postdoc maybe that would be better. thats what I did, I Got one from my postdoc and PI because they would be different letters (postdoc alot more personal and he has seen me grow) and PI can attest to the work that I have done and the "quality".
i valued the postdoc letter higher, even though the PI was a big name. personal is better anyway. not sure on your relationship with your postdoc or grad student though
edit--> just saw that OP is applying MD PHD. not as familiar with MD PHD but a strong mentor letter > bad PI letter right? gotta hedge your bets on your best odds and move forward!
oh wow didnt know that was a hard requirement for md phd. i stand corrected.no. for MD/PhD, a mentor letter is meaningless and not acceptable without PI signing off. You can get the letter from post-doc, but the PI must sign off on it.
I think OP needs to ask his PI if he will write him a strong letter. Or have the post-doc write the letter and ask if the PI is willing to sign off on it. Schools not only want letter, they absolutely REQUIRE PI letters. It is also not uncommon for schools to require letters from every single significant research experience. I ran into problem with this because I did not get a letter from one of my summer research PI (2 months), but fortunately for me, this was freshmen year summer so I explained it as "it was a summer experience 3 years ago, since then I have these 3 other PI letters." Given that OP worked with this PI for 2 years and has publication, it would be a huge red flag if he doesn't have letter and will undoubtedly be asked this question numerous times during interview (if he even gets them). You can't exactly bad mouth anyone during interview so I don't see how OP can explain this away in good light. I would recommend he try to repair relationship with PI in any way possible if he wants a shot at MDPHD, otherwise you need a legitimately good story to explain it, and the story can't be that your PI is a jerk.What worries me about the situation is that even if the OP can get a letter, will it be a good one?
OP we'll need to ask can he get a good letter of recommendation for his application to medical school?
And to add an edit, I would also be pissed off if my student of 2 years suddenly decided to switch to the lab of my competitor.
Just because scientists may be smart people, it doesn't mean that they are not human beings, and subject to the foibles we all have.
I think OP needs to ask his PI if he will write him a strong letter. Or have the post-doc write the letter and ask if the PI is willing to sign off on it. Schools not only want letter, they absolutely REQUIRE PI letters. It is also not uncommon for schools to require letters from every single significant research experience. I ran into problem with this because I did not get a letter from one of my summer research PI (2 months), but fortunately for me, this was freshmen year summer so I explained it as "it was a summer experience 3 years ago, since then I have these 3 other PI letters." Given that OP worked with this PI for 2 years and has publication, it would be a huge red flag if he doesn't have letter and will undoubtedly be asked this question numerous times during interview (if he even gets them). You can't exactly bad mouth anyone during interview so I don't see how OP can explain this away in good light. I would recommend he try to repair relationship with PI in any way possible if he wants a shot at MDPHD, otherwise you need a legitimately good story to explain it, and the story can't be that your PI is a jerk.
Yup!
In the worst-case scenario for OP, even if MD/PhD is off the table, one can still be a researcher with just the MD.
A PI LOR Is NOT required
One of my regrets in research was not communicating more with the research associate I worked for after he refused to have me back another semester (...and I was burned from a publication). I mean he definitely wasn't a good or honest researcher, but we had been close and I got a chip on my shoulder over research for quite a while.
Even if you don't want to use the letter, I'd see this through.
Yup. And it's just like nearly any other professionI feel that. Labs are tricky and have their own world of politics. I have seen it up close. I certainly didn't start off my research experience on a positive note. Though after that initial phase, I was all-in.
Yup. And it's just like nearly any other profession
You have dinguses, and you have nice people like my old PI (the associate was the prob!)
You have competent researchers, and those who lack so many soft skills you wonder how they got the position
I'm sure lots of people had more pleasant experiences and worked with wonderful mentors. I suppose a poor mentor and maybe some immaturity on my part did me in. Still wish I'd followed up with the associate though
That's why I tell anyone who's interested in research, or just needs to check off a box, to do their due diligence before joining. Prevent them from getting too unlucky or stuck in a bad sitch. Like people should ask themselves , am I compatible with the grad student / postdoc I would take orders from? Do I like the PI? Is the research interesting? Do I want a large, safe but impersonal lab or do I want a smaller lab with all the potential for highs and lows? Are the methods cool?And as an undergrad, the crazy thing is how much it can be to chance whether you are stuck in a good situation (2-3+ years in the same lab, a full-time paid summer, maybe a pub or two) or a bad situation (less than 6 months - 1 year in a couple of labs, never finding stability, no LoR). Some PIs and labs are just terrible and undergrads are essentially dish washers and other PIs and labs give undergrads an opportunity to learn, apply, and then work alongside everyone else in the lab as almost an equal.
This is what’s been frustrating for me. I feel like ive had friends “fall” into independent projects with good mentorship, and they’re just doing research to build their med school app. I’ve had to fight for everything I’ve gotten and only now would I have had a project of my own in the old lab. Yes I did get a publication there, but I really want to experience the new lab since it aligns with my interests and I get along with the people more. Just frustrating to see my undergrad colleagues trotting along and having the path laid for them even though they don’t care deeply about research. I was once absolutely set on the MD PhD but have honestly become jaded to research after constantly stressing about lab choice and how I can get the opportunities I want. Can’t even tell if it’s the people around me or just me at this point. I know that I am more intentional and care more about my work than the average undergrad. I think about all the time. Unfortunately, that thinking has been mostly stressful lately.
Hahah sorry for the rant. This is bringing up some larger issues in general.