dont do eitherOpen to suggestions.
I can turf to MILD, turf for SCS trial.
dont do eitherOpen to suggestions.
I can turf to MILD, turf for SCS trial.
That LF looks thick. MILD if you're gonna do anything at all.View attachment 405607
Stenosis symptoms, back and leg.
Failed ESI 3 ways and MBB.
Surgeon refuses as osteoporosis and 83 yrs old.
Next step?
Yes own the bone @lobelsteve !!! Just like you taught all of us. Then when no longer osteoporotic send to surgery for the only treatment that’ll really work. That is unless you want to pay off your boat with a procedureCement augmented pedicle screw placement. Usually a scoliosis/deformity surgeon is more comfortable with this. The patient really needs to lose weight. Lots of adipose and visceral fat which is accentuating the lordosis.
Brace, PT, weight loss
Dexa scan, increase bone density with ca/vit D, teriparatide
Do they not want to do it because old, OP, or overweight? The age won't change the weight could and so could the OP. They can also do bone stimulator after surgery
Have you done Intracept in patients with documented osteoporosis?I would do Intracept first, see how she is overall if axial pain is better and only has to deal with leg symptoms. If leg symptoms are bad enough then mild.
Contraindicated, no?Have you done Intracept in patients with documented osteoporosis?
Yes, not contraindicatedHave you done Intracept in patients with documented osteoporosis?
With all that spurring I believe it is a mild grade 1.Yes, I would never call that a grade 2.
Nearest competition/collaborative.Why would you send for trial?
This is not what is being taught at the ASIPP or AAPMR conferences. Have been told several times that osteoporosis is a relative contraindicationYes, not contraindicated
From website:This is not what is being taught at the ASIPP or AAPMR conferences. Have been told several times that osteoporosis is a relative contraindication
Need to check the LCD as well. T score <-2.5 listed under exclusion criteria in some. I have done cases with osteopenia, I am much more restrictive with bending lifting precautions and duration post op. There was also that one case series published where fracture rate was I believe about 10% with OP.From website:
Safety and effectiveness in patients with conditions that are associated with poor bone quality such as osteoporosis have not been established.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Use of the Intracept Intraosseous Nerve Ablation System is contraindicated in:
Patients with severe cardiac or pulmonary compromise
Patients with active implantable pulse generators (e.g. pacemakers, defibrillators)
Patients where the targeted ablation zone is < 10 mm away from a sensitive structure not intended to be ablated, including the vertebral foramen (spinal canal)
Patients with active systemic infection or local infection in the area to be treated
Patients who are pregnant
Skeletally immature patients (generally ≤ 18 years of age)
Good call on the LCD.Need to check the LCD as well. T score <-2.5 listed under exclusion criteria in some. I have done cases with osteopenia, I am much more restrictive with bending lifting precautions and duration post op. There was also that one case series published where fracture rate was I believe about 10% with OP.
I swore I just saw this case on LinkedIn about a Stryker Omnicurve access, cementing the body/disc/body below, but forgot who did it. Regardless, Butrans/bone health/MILD/BVNA/PNS vs SCSView attachment 405607
Stenosis symptoms, back and leg.
Failed ESI 3 ways and MBB.
Surgeon refuses as osteoporosis and 83 yrs old.
Next step?
Pretty sure Beall and only Beall would do thatI swore I just saw this case on LinkedIn about a Stryker Omnicurve access, cementing the body/disc/body below, but forgot who did it. Regardless, Butrans/bone health/MILD/BVNA/PNS vs SCS
Well…. I’d like to think he would at least make sure he was actually treating a compression fracture….Pretty sure Beall and only Beall would do that
Posted in the dick of the week thread.I swore I just saw this case on LinkedIn about a Stryker Omnicurve access, cementing the body/disc/body below, but forgot who did it. Regardless, Butrans/bone health/MILD/BVNA/PNS vs SCS
I saw a patient a little bit ago who had this done to them by an IR doc doing vertebroplasty. The doc then refused to follow up with the patient and pcp sent them to me.I swore I just saw this case on LinkedIn about a Stryker Omnicurve access, cementing the body/disc/body below, but forgot who did it. Regardless, Butrans/bone health/MILD/BVNA/PNS vs SCS
Review this thread from the beginning. It could be worse- on the other side of the VB into the canal.I saw a patient a little bit ago who had this done to them by an IR doc doing vertebroplasty. The doc then refused to follow up with the patient and pcp sent them to me.
What kind of esi were done? Midline or transforaminal? If you did an esi, why mbb afterwards?View attachment 405607
Stenosis symptoms, back and leg.
Failed ESI 3 ways and MBB.
Surgeon refuses as osteoporosis and 83 yrs old.
Next step?
Usually anterior leak causes nothing, leave it alongReview this thread from the beginning. It could be worse- on the other side of the VB into the canal.
If contained and stays localized… Yes… But still scary re what can embolize in a vessel during the case.Usually anterior leak causes nothing, leave it along
THat's what the fluoro is for. See my pics where I bagged smaller veins at consecutive levels. Eyes on screen when turning cement.If contained and stays localized… Yes… But still scary re what can embolize in a vessel during the case.
Even if a small amount vent into the epidural vein, it is not a bid deal, unless it is still liquid, not polymerised. I saw a lung CT with a lot of embodies, but an idiot surgeon missed intravascular injection completely, that is why you do injection on the lateral veiw live, and do not do more than 2 levels at a timeIf contained and stays localized… Yes… But still scary re what can embolize in a vessel during the case.
If pt becomes symptomatic order very scan right a wayEven if a small amount vent into the epidural vein, it is not a bid deal, unless it is still liquid, not polymerised. I saw a lung CT with a lot of embodies, but an idiot surgeon missed intravascular injection completely, that is why you do injection on the lateral veiw live, and do not do more than 2 levels at a time
Surgentec ion screws. Should theoretically work but I haven’t done any. I do like their tilink-p for si joint fusion which is similar.View attachment 406857
This is my first time seeing this. Patient moved from other side of state and said they got a 'facet spacer' which didn't work. It looks like this CAVUX FFS-LX | Providence
Is anyone doing these? It looks... not helpful.
What's The proposed mechanism behind these anyways? Is it just a fuse the joint an isolated facet disease? To me it looks no similar than a facet screw which was abandoned by surgeons long ago.Looks like the Surgentec IA dowels to fuse the joint.
Doesn’t work.
Can consider it for mild instability with primarily facet mediated pain, revision of interspinous spacer failure, adjacent level arthritis in patient who wants a “fix”. I would probably only be offering it to elderly patients who aren’t great surgical candidates and don’t want injections after at least one diagnostic mbb.What's The proposed mechanism behind these anyways? Is it just a fuse the joint an isolated facet disease? To me it looks no similar than a facet screw which was abandoned by surgeons long ago.
Excellent marbling....and an absolutely massive pannus covering the thighs to the knees.
As usual, it seems I am the first physician to completely focus all of our visit on the weight. Never been told he needs to see bariatrics, but has been told he needs to "lose a few pounds." We are sooooooo far past that bro.
View attachment 407159View attachment 407160View attachment 407161