- Joined
- Oct 3, 2007
- Messages
- 336
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 0
This thread has degenerated and frankly, the physicians are JUST as guilty as the nurses and nursing students who are posting. I'd like to see the physicians get off their high-horse...there is WAY more bashing of nurses here than there is of physicians. We act as if we are more professional and educated than they are but yet cannot behave that way in public or on an internet forum. The nurses and nursing students who have posted here have shown a lot more restraint than some of their colleagues and some of us here.
However, I would like to point out again no thread about nursing concerns long survives here without a bunch of random RNs coming through to trash us and the medical profession in general.
It is true that we have a bad habit of turning our specific frustrations into generalizations about nurses. But by the same token, consider the statements embedded in the "restrained" posts by nurses (MDs aren't important, MDs just make a mess of things).
The problem here, in my mind, is this: the interns/residents want to talk, while the nurses just want to get the mods to shut down the thread.
I doubt it is any accident that every time this issue arrises, there are suddenly 2-3 "new" nursing users who pop up to post, only to never be heard from again once the thread is killed.
I'm still here, Tired. Truthfully, I don't know how much I'll be contributing. But if I can offer any useful insight re: the contemptuous relationships between nurses/docs, I shall offer my .02. Respectfully, of course.
It's a good idea, but the only way to do that is to provide some confirmation via email. I'll kick it up to the mods. They may go for it because it will calm down this forum, but still give you guys a place to vent.Suggestion: A protected internship forum, where entry requires some bona fides of being a doctor.
doc02, that sucks about the patient.You know what's great? The fact that nurses can just randomly come into a thread and get it shut down. It's interesting how all of a sudden a bunch of "Health Students" with new accounts ran into the thread and started trolling with ludicrous statements intended to engender a negative response from everyone else. It's pathetic how this happens to every thread about nurses. Here's an idea: rather than shut down the thread, why don't you just ban the nurses if they try that?...
It's a good idea, but the only way to do that is to provide some confirmation via email. I'll kick it up to the mods. They may go for it because it will calm down this forum, but still give you guys a place to vent.
In the mean time, try the Lounge.
Suggestion: A protected internship forum, where entry requires some bona fides of being a doctor.
...and Kim, I've been posting in the Surgeons suck" thread for some time now. Frankly, it has become one-sided. We welcome your input. 😉
You know what's great? The fact that nurses can just randomly come into a thread and get it shut down. It's interesting how all of a sudden a bunch of "Health Students" with new accounts ran into the thread and started trolling with ludicrous statements intended to engender a negative response from everyone else. It's pathetic how this happens to every thread about nurses. Here's an idea: rather than shut down the thread, why don't you just ban the nurses if they try that?
My thread was fine and I'm going to defend it. I was talking about an encounter with a nurse and her actions were ludicrous. And yet, because it was a nurse that I was criticizing, I got a bunch of people who came in to lecture me that somehow I was the one who was being inappropriate or that I had to "learn how to get along with others," as if I had just walked up to a random nurse and started slugging her in the back of the head. To most nurses on this forum, apparently, any action taken by any nurse is either completely OK or, at best, "not right, but still something that you have to understand comes with the territory."
That's the pathetic part. I acknowledge the role of nurses, read my last post on my closed thread. However, I refuse to say that they are EQUALS to physicians. They have important BUT NON-EQUIVALENT roles in dealing with patients. The fact that this upsets people does not, therefore, mean that it is wrong or that it is abusive or that the world is about to end. If this forum is just intended for us to sit around and talk about how we all respect everyone else and we are one big family and we're going to pretend nothing bad ever happens in the hospital, count me out.
In closing, I'm post call and I had a patient who had a chronically low blood pressure who was at his baseline, mentating fine, and with a stable heart rate. The nurse bomb paged me about him and I saw him and said he was fine and she then proceeded to call the attending and tell me there was a patient "in shock" and crashing on the floor. I had an interesting conversation with the attending about her. Later that night, the patient actually DID become hypotensive and tachycardic ...and the nurse didn't tell me. I found out that she had simply continued to lamely document his vital signs every few hours as they deteriorated. She said that she figured since I "wasn't concerned about the patient being in shock earlier, I wouldn't care about him being in shock now." Good job! You earned my respect!
I was not offended with how you handled the situation with the rude nurse. I did get offended when you stated if you got bored, you might walk the dog.
It's unfortunate you people feel this way. You need to remember that down the road, it will indeed benefit you to coexist with nursing, as peacefully as possible. It makes both our jobs, much easier. Peace.
P.S. One last thing: lots of nurses use the excuse "we have to call you for x because of medico-legal policy." Like any man with BPH who needs a Foley at my place "requires" a physician to put it in. This actually isn't a policy, it's just evolved into one because the nurses use it as an excuse to not put in the Foley "in case something happens." The reality is it makes their job easier because someone else has to do it now. I'm a regular old intern, I have no special Foley training, no special ninja skillz in pushing a tube into a guy's penis, but they say I do. So I'll just go and do it. Now ask yourself: is that how you earn respect?
Answer: not from me. If other people say yes, then they are fine people. Good for them.
It's unfortunate that some nurses don't believe in the "peaceful co-existence" that you're preaching, though.
So I can tell you what these nurses are thinking: they are not going to be held liable for traumatizing a guy's urethra in attempting to push that catheter through tumors and adhesions.
SDN simply does not have the resources to make phone calls, etc. to verify every members stated identity and I would venture there are many members who would not want us to do that as well because it would mean knowing your name and location. Obivously we have done it on a small scale with our Mentors and the Neonatology forum but I expect that the level of interest in reading an Internship forum is much greater and is too great a tax on the limited SDN volunteer resources to verify everyone's credentials.
I have a relatively simple (I think) solution:
Provide an NPI number via PM. Every intern/resident/attending should have one, and it is easily verified online.
Of course, how do we know that the SDN user is who they say they are?
Also, it would also be difficult to argue some of the points that the RNs make here without revealing your status as an RN ("I've been doing this for 20 years and I know better" is not an argument made by physicians).
These are good points. However, making the forum closed will keep med students like myself out.My thinking was this: If it's a closed forum, then these politeness rules could probably be substantially relaxed or even done away with...Especially a bunch of overworked, non-appreciated interns with chips on their shoulders...
We can make this a registered-only viewership forum. However, it doesn't prevent non-docs from getting access. Additionally, if we required NPI numbers or some other similar system, then it would limit a lot of our core membership from accessing the forum.
On that note, I want to make one issue clear - SDN is a site for doctors and doctors-in-training. We're not a site for the entire healthcare team.
SDN is strictly a site for open discussion among different professions within one of our 9 represented communities.
If a non-doc uses SDN, they do so at their own discretion. In terms of moderation, we will always give preference to our core membership. RNs, CRNAs, PAs, etc are welcome to visit SDN, but our core membership comes first.
On the thread in question, it was closed for the reasons noted above.
On that note, I want to make one issue clear - SDN is a site for doctors and doctors-in-training. We're not a site for the entire healthcare team.
...
If a non-doc uses SDN, they do so at their own discretion. In terms of moderation, we will always give preference to our core membership. RNs, CRNAs, PAs, etc are welcome to visit SDN, but our core membership comes first.
You, by your one pontificating statement have alienated everyone BUT physicians - and physicians in training (altho my own daughter, who is 18 months from being a physician and my husband who is a dentist - certainly NOT a doctor in your narrow minded view - might both be alienated on my behalf!). I often read this thread because my own daughter will be an intern in 18 months & I annually have to work with new interns. It helps to know & be reminded of how they think & view things, which I take for granted.
...
You, sir, have offended just about everyone who does not have MD/DO behind his/her name. I didn't realize that my contributions on the pharmacist's forum were always subject to the whim's & misconceptions of the various physicians who have visited it! Nor did I realize my participation in this site was only as a "guest" & not a valid & significant user in my field.
How arrogant!!!
That's a great point, and one that's often forgotten. One of the quirks of having a diverse member base, I supposed.
I think you misunderstood Lee's point. SDN is free to be viewed by anyone by the public; membership, however, is a privilege, not a right - and as such everyone is bound by the SDN Terms of Service and its policies and procedures upon joining.
In essence, this is private organization with its own rules, regulations and standards - and these are at the discretion of the SDN founders.
I think your post is unnecessarily hostile and needlessly directed at Lee. I'd advise against blasting one of SDN's founders with hyperbole and over-generalizations that really are, in my opinion, both inappropriate and patronizing.
I think you misinterpreted my post.
I respect all doctoral degrees equally. Doctors include: MD, DO, DDS, DMD, PharmD, OD, AuD, DVM, DPT, etc... No where in my post did I say "physicians."
Hm, quite a discussion I have started. Anyone want to get back to my original topic?
God forbid should any of us learn anything from someone who is not a DOCTOR.
I have a relatively simple (I think) solution:
Provide an NPI number via PM. Every intern/resident/attending should have one, and it is easily verified online.
What do you think might happen if I so openly express my displeasure at being what amounts to "disenfranchised" from the whole site?" Will I lose my membership decoder ring - no - I never got that! Will I loose my pocket license which says I "belong" - no, never got that either.
But, I will take objection when the whole lot of us is tossed out to "protect the central core" - sounds like something out of a bad movie!
Does it matter anymore if you were right or wrong in the instance you illuminated? Rightness can lead you right down the road to being "right" in the actual situation medically, but wrong in all the other ways. Give yourself time to think back - was there another way you could have been "right" and not have made someone feel as though he/she couldn't talk to you anymore or have perhaps felt badly personally. You won the battle, but who won the war - did anyone win the war - is winning the war the issue?
...I wouldn't be expected to take this pompous preaching from a pharmacist on the wards, why do I have to take it here, from one who's already been run out the Anesthesia forum by a different set of docs?
I respect nurses who do their job and understand what their job is...