M mymembernames Full Member 15+ Year Member Nov 27, 2016 #1 Advertisement - Members don't see this ad Under CN IV Damage, shouldn't it say head tilts away from the side of the lesion instead of "toward" TIA!
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad Under CN IV Damage, shouldn't it say head tilts away from the side of the lesion instead of "toward" TIA!
Phloston Osaka, Japan Removed Lifetime Donor Verified Member 10+ Year Member Physician Gold Donor Nov 28, 2016 #2 mymembernames said: Under CN IV Damage, shouldn't it say head tilts away from the side of the lesion instead of "toward" TIA! Click to expand... As far as I can see, the FA16 entry is saying it's exacerbated by ipsilateral head tilt. Later in the same sentence, it says 'may present with compensatory head tilt in the opposite direction'. Upvote 0 Downvote
mymembernames said: Under CN IV Damage, shouldn't it say head tilts away from the side of the lesion instead of "toward" TIA! Click to expand... As far as I can see, the FA16 entry is saying it's exacerbated by ipsilateral head tilt. Later in the same sentence, it says 'may present with compensatory head tilt in the opposite direction'.
D DrPicard Full Member 7+ Year Member Nov 28, 2016 #3 Tilts away from the affected eye to compensate, but towards the affected nerve since it decussates. Upvote 0 Downvote