I personally think postbac is a waste of time
hense..
http://www.naahp.org/resources_Postbac_Article2.htm
hope this helps...
I would take that article with an enormous VW-sized block of salt. From the byline:
"by Gerald Soslau, Ph.D., Yolanda Pressley, and Laura Mangano"
It just so happens those Dr. Soslau is the dean in charge of the Office of Professional Studies in Health Sciences at Drexel University, and Ms. Pressley and Ms. Mangano work under him. Through this office, Drexel runs fourteen programs, including SMPs, each designed to help students reach some vague healthcare-related goal. And of course, they charge handsomely for this service.
In the article, there are five different scenarios, representing five different under-qualified applicants to medical school. And who would believe that through the Office of Professional Studies in the Health Sciences, Drexel has
just the program for four of those five hypothetical students (excluding the one who needs additional undergraduate level coursework).
Just for kicks, see the third reference at the bottom on the page.
As for skittles927's question: I would go with the post-bacc. It might not be entirely necessary if you're graduating in May 2011 because you'll have two more semesters to bump up your GPA. You could also delay graduation a year, and just take more coursework assuming you don't attend an expensive private college.
Best of luck!