concerned_student
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2019
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 7
Current 3rd year student at a newer DO program with concerns regarding my and my peer's 3rd year core rotations. I'm seeking advice about the process of reporting violation of COCA Accreditation Standard 6.10:
A COM must ensure that each student participates in one or more required core rotation(s) prior to the fourth year clinical clerkship experience that is conducted in a health care setting in which the student works with resident physicians currently enrolled in an accredited program of graduate medical education. In addition to the above expectation, a minimum of one required third year clinical clerkship must be completed under the supervision of an osteopathic physician and more than one of the required third year clinical clerkship experiences must include an inpatient component.
It feels like our rotations have been haphazardly thrown together and many of us feel the school has strung us along with empty promises from the beginning. I believe the school will fail to meet compliance with Accreditation Standard Element 6.10 for my class. From my own personal experience as well as testimonials from my peers, a significant number of us will NOT complete a core rotation with resident physicians. Many of us are rotating in smaller, private community hospitals and/or outpatient clinics. We could possibly arrange a third year elective and find our own rotation with a residency program but as I understand the language of the requirement, this fails to meet the accreditation standard set forth by COCA.
I am concerned about potential retaliation by the school/admin regarding my future if I choose to move forward with a compliant. The COCA reporting policy does not allow for anonymous submissions and I do not want my chance at residency trashed due to retaliation remarks left in the dean's letter or a bogus professionalism claim for being the squeaky wheel.
A COM must ensure that each student participates in one or more required core rotation(s) prior to the fourth year clinical clerkship experience that is conducted in a health care setting in which the student works with resident physicians currently enrolled in an accredited program of graduate medical education. In addition to the above expectation, a minimum of one required third year clinical clerkship must be completed under the supervision of an osteopathic physician and more than one of the required third year clinical clerkship experiences must include an inpatient component.
It feels like our rotations have been haphazardly thrown together and many of us feel the school has strung us along with empty promises from the beginning. I believe the school will fail to meet compliance with Accreditation Standard Element 6.10 for my class. From my own personal experience as well as testimonials from my peers, a significant number of us will NOT complete a core rotation with resident physicians. Many of us are rotating in smaller, private community hospitals and/or outpatient clinics. We could possibly arrange a third year elective and find our own rotation with a residency program but as I understand the language of the requirement, this fails to meet the accreditation standard set forth by COCA.
I am concerned about potential retaliation by the school/admin regarding my future if I choose to move forward with a compliant. The COCA reporting policy does not allow for anonymous submissions and I do not want my chance at residency trashed due to retaliation remarks left in the dean's letter or a bogus professionalism claim for being the squeaky wheel.