And as for the comments about the racist chant from the OU fraternity, OU is funded by the state of Oklahoma and is therefore an extension of it; thus, it must abide by constitutional principles, including the first amendment (
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...ity-may-not-expel-students-for-racist-speech/) . What the OU president did is unconstitutional, and it is only a matter of time before a case is made against the OU president. The speech was not violent or inciting violence in any way. I do think that it was grotesque and should not have been said, but the 1A is there to protect all speech provided that it is not violent or inciting violence, whether or not we like it. And before any of you say "they're not free from the consequences of the speech," actually given that OU is a state university and must abide by the constitution, these fraternity boys are free from them.