Pregnancy Appendectomy

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

kmurp

Junior Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2005
Messages
491
Reaction score
120
Wondering what you all are doing for anesthesia for appendectomy in the pregnant woman. We used to do SAB. Then the procedure went laparoscopic so we moved to GA. Now we have the scary literature on CNS damage in developing brains. Do any of you force the surgeons to do the procedure open (the old way) so you can do it under SAB?
 
Wondering what you all are doing for anesthesia for appendectomy in the pregnant woman. We used to do SAB. Then the procedure went laparoscopic so we moved to GA. Now we have the scary literature on CNS damage in developing brains. Do any of you force the surgeons to do the procedure open (the old way) so you can do it under SAB?
This is an area of huge controversy in the pediatric anesthesia community. There is a large and increasing amount of research on apoptosis in the developing brain.
Here is a good place to start (from last months A&A). Check the references.
Anesth Analg. 2010 Feb;110(2):442-8. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
The young: neuroapoptosis induced by anesthetics and what to do about it.
Creeley CE, Olney JW.O
Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Comment in:
Anesth Analg. 2010 Feb;110(2):291-2.
Millions of human fetuses, infants, and children are exposed to anesthetic drugs every year in the United States and throughout the world. Anesthesia administered during critical stages of neurodevelopment has been considered safe and without adverse long-term consequences. However, recent reports provide mounting evidence that exposure of the immature animal brain to anesthetics during the period of rapid synaptogenesis, also known as the brain growth spurt period, triggers widespread apoptotic neurodegeneration, inhibits neurogenesis, and causes significant long-term neurocognitive impairment. Herein, we summarize currently available evidence for anesthesia-induced pathological changes in the brain and associated long-term neurocognitive deficits and discuss promising strategies for protecting the developing brain from the potentially injurious effects of anesthetic drugs while allowing the beneficial actions of these drugs to be realized.

The only real conclusions are that most of our anesthetics are bad for the developing brain of mice. Some new literature suggests that there is evidence of damage and impairment in macaques, which is concerning, though it appears to be related to duration. The human studies are really weak and inconclusive. If you want to be conservative, keep it simple and clean and avoid multiple agents (N2O, ketamine, midaz, etc). And get it done as quickly as possible, ie attending driving vs 2 residents w/ minimal supervision. Or, do it open with a spinal. I would also recommend Doppler or US before and after to confirm that the fetus is still alive. Tight BP control, etc, etc.
The next few years should be interesting.
 
Last edited:
This is an area of huge controversy in the pediatric anesthesia community. There is a large and increasing amount of research on apoptosis in the developing brain.
Here is a good place to start (from last months A&A). Check the references.
Anesth Analg. 2010 Feb;110(2):442-8. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
The young: neuroapoptosis induced by anesthetics and what to do about it.
Creeley CE, Olney JW.O
Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Comment in:
Anesth Analg. 2010 Feb;110(2):291-2.
Millions of human fetuses, infants, and children are exposed to anesthetic drugs every year in the United States and throughout the world. Anesthesia administered during critical stages of neurodevelopment has been considered safe and without adverse long-term consequences. However, recent reports provide mounting evidence that exposure of the immature animal brain to anesthetics during the period of rapid synaptogenesis, also known as the brain growth spurt period, triggers widespread apoptotic neurodegeneration, inhibits neurogenesis, and causes significant long-term neurocognitive impairment. Herein, we summarize currently available evidence for anesthesia-induced pathological changes in the brain and associated long-term neurocognitive deficits and discuss promising strategies for protecting the developing brain from the potentially injurious effects of anesthetic drugs while allowing the beneficial actions of these drugs to be realized.

The only real conclusions are that most of our anesthetics are bad for the developing brain of mice. Some new literature suggests that there is evidence of damage and impairment in macaques, which is concerning, though it appears to be related to duration. The human studies are really weak and inconclusive. If you want to be conservative, keep it simple and clean and avoid multiple agents (N2O, ketamine, midaz, etc). And get it done as quickly as possible, ie attending driving vs 2 residents w/ minimal supervision.
The next few years should be interesting.

Damn it. I always wondered why newly delivered mice and macaques acted kinda funny--all that apoptosis doing its dirty work. I will alter my future care to SAB for my next pregnant Mice/macaque (sp?). Sorry, bro', couldn't resist😉
 
Interesting as the general surgery teaching is that if it must be done during the first trimester you do it open under a high regional block not GA because of risk to fetus.

That being said, I don't do this procedure anymore so am not sure what is still standard but I reviewed my board exam stuff from 2 years ago and it says open/no GA.
 
Interesting as the general surgery teaching is that if it must be done during the first trimester you do it open under a high regional block not GA because of risk to fetus.

That being said, I don't do this procedure anymore so am not sure what is still standard but I reviewed my board exam stuff from 2 years ago and it says open/no GA.

Regional anesthesia with open procedure is still the safest way to go.
There has been increased numbers of laparoscopic procedures under GA in the first trimester lately but the long term data about outcome and subsequent child development is almost non existent.
If you have to do it under GA you'd better have a very good reason that you know you can defend even 18 years later when the child grows up and blames you for his career flipping burgers.
 
Regional anesthesia with open procedure is still the safest way to go.

If you have to do it under GA you'd better have a very good reason that you know you can defend even 18 years later when the child grows up and blames you for his career flipping burgers.

Unfortunately, it's the surgeon's call on doing the surgery or not in these cases. (And we pull out far too many normal looking appendices likely due to over-read and equivocal CT scans). The surgeon needs to thoroughly document the need for the procedure, and I'd make sure the informed consents give some indication that there is significant risk to the fetus, particularly in the first trimester.
 
Unfortunately, it's the surgeon's call on doing the surgery or not in these cases. (And we pull out far too many normal looking appendices likely due to over-read and equivocal CT scans). The surgeon needs to thoroughly document the need for the procedure, and I'd make sure the informed consents give some indication that there is significant risk to the fetus, particularly in the first trimester.

I'm just wondering who these guys are that are insisting on lap procedures under GA when the "board answer" is regional with an open appy in the first trimester pregnant patient. Of course, we know the board answer isn't always what's done in practice, but it is, as Plank notes, the safest.

Document, document, document. The arm of litigation in these cases is VERY long.
 
Appendectomy is probably one of the procedures that benefits the less from a laparoscopic technique...
 
Top