tell me what medical school u got accepted to and show me the transcript.
taking classes are CCs are fine and dandy but they won't help u if u don't prove u can do it at the university level. it's the truth.
UCSF and UCSD have straight up told ppl that they won't look too highly at an applicant if u took most of ur pre-reqs at a CC.
u can get into A SCHOOL, but prollie won't be highly regarded.
and tell me a med school that will take a guy who takes most of his pre-reqs at a CC.
I'm going to have to lean more towards doublehh03's side. Sure some CC's are just as hard as 4 yrs. But those are the exceptions, not the norm. And generally speaking, schools will look down on CC courses b/c they are GENERALLY easier than 4 yr's. Ask any admissions committee that.
I received a few C's in my chem and bio pre-req's but during my interview, the lady stated, "I know UC Davis is a top 50 school so I understand those C's probably don't show your capabilities like you said. I see in o-chem you got A's and B's at UCD also. That shows you improved and can handle UCD's science load, and can probably handle our curriculum here also."
I guarantee you if I received C's at UCD, then went to a CC instead and got A's and B's in o-chem, it wouldn't mean a thing to the adcom.
More and more applicants have a bachelors now, which implies they can handle the 4 yr's course-load. And guess what, majority of graduate programs are on the same level of difficulty as 4 yr's (at least the perception is).
With all that being said....if you take 2 full years of pre-req's at a CC and get straight A's (or close to it), score an 80 and above on the PCAT, have some pharmacy experience, and can interview decent...well, congratulations b/c you are almost guaranteed admissions to a good program of your choice.