- Joined
- Oct 3, 2006
- Messages
- 168
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 4,531
- Medical Student
Hmm...two posts in a derm forum. Both bashing dermatologists. Trolling anyone?
Hmm...two posts in a derm forum. Both bashing dermatologists. Trolling anyone?
Procedure stealing? Are you serious? Cutting off a mole? let it go man, you're over paid anyway.
They say that our reimbursements are going to go downtown to Chinatown!
I can see the logic in increasing primary care salaries.
I still think, however, it will remain an unpopular field as long as primary care physicians are asked to work such long hours and manage such mundane cases. (Saying "Hello! Good morning! Lose weight!" to your first 20 patients probably isn't satisfying even if your pay is increased.)
It is true that medicare reimbursements have declined recently for specialty medicine, and those for primary care are increasing. It is likely that this trend will continue until we have made a dent in the dangerous shortage of primary care doctors in the US.
Source? (Just interested in an article or something)
I still think, however, it will remain an unpopular field as long as primary care physicians are asked to work such long hours and manage such mundane cases. (Saying "Hello! Good morning! Lose weight!" to your first 20 patients probably isn't satisfying even if your pay is increased.)
lol... like dermatology isn't mundane (Saying "Just pop the zit! Stay out of the sun! Put some of this cream on it! Here, have some botox" )😛
lol... like dermatology isn't mundane (Saying "Just pop the zit! Stay out of the sun! Put some of this cream on it! Here, have some botox" )😛
hahaha
that's true
can't argue that
the hours are better though!
the hours are better though!
and pay! 😀
Dermatologists are well off and deal with many pt's with skin cancer's and whatnot and have great salaries.
Given the three-month wait for a new-patient appointment with most of the dermatologists in my area, I don't think any of them are complaining about not being busy enough... 😉
his secret apparently is that all of his pts are 1st seen by a pa
That wouldn't fly with me. By the time I refer someone to derm, they need to see the dermatologist, not somebody with even less training than I have. I don't take kindly to specialists who waste time, mine or my patient's.
isn't it likely that this derm PA has lots of experience (especially after seeing every patient of this derm for years) and is well trained through such experience to know what is a zebra and what is a common and easily treated problem?
chances are the derm pa knows more derm than you do.
My third year of med school, I was rotating on FP. One of the residents I was with had a gyn patient with chronic vag bleeding he hadn't been able to manage, so he referred her to Gyn.
A few weeks later, I ran into him in the hall, he had just started an Ob/Gyn clinic month. On his first day, he got a consult from himself, and saw the same damn patient from his FP clinic . . .
Such is the irony of the teaching hospital. However, now that he's working directly with an OB-Gyn attending, it's a great learning opportunity. Next time, he might not have to refer a patient like that at all.
KENT- you have already conceded in other posts that it is likely that a specialty pa knows more about their specialty than the majority of physicians who do not practice that specialty. if you hppen to have a special interest in derm and are quite good at it than I owe you an apology-consider it given-if you are a more typical fm residency grad than it is likely that a derm pa knows more derm than you.
on a separate note-
the derm pa in this office bills out at 125 dollars for a 15 min appt before any labs/procedures/biopsies/etc
that's $960,000 of billing a yr if all his appts are filled. I'm guessing he probably makes 125k/yr so the derm md is making bank by using him.
I haven't seen the derm md yet but I'm guessing if I do he bils out at more than 125/15 min appt.
Dermatology PAs will not be needed as much in the future if FM continues to take the turf that the Dermatologists refuse to commit to by refusing to increase their numbers.
This is clearly a turf war. Check it out.
I didn't see anything in that article about a "turf war." The article was about shopping mall Botox treatments administered by nurse practitioners, and the need for physician supervision to prevent poor outcomes in the face of increasing demand and profit motivation.
That being said, any licensed physician can open a "medical spa" and perform or supervise minimally-invasive cosmetic procedures. Let's face it...Botox isn't rocket science.
Leavy said each state has different qualifications rules for those who perform minimally invasive cosmetic procedures. Work done by those poorly trained can lead to "a lot of complications," he said.
In October, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery drew up "guiding principles" for supervision of non-physician personnel in medical spas. Specialists in the field say the issue is who's running these spas and who's supervising.
Dr. Richard A. D'Amico, president-elect of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, said the concern is more about safety than location. He said that it's important that such procedures are at least overseen by a plastic surgeon or a dermatologist.
The procedures may look like simple injections, but serious complications could result if someone isn't properly trained. For example, an injection that paralyzes the muscle, like Botox, given in the wrong spot could cause an eyelid to droop, he said.
Skinovative USA, a Tempe, Arizona-based chain of medical spas that opened in 2001, does not demand that its medical directors be plastic surgeons or dermatologists.
Dermatology is a basic part of FM residency and it's not the first time they are exposed to the specialty... (after med school clinical and basic science). Hence the whole topic of this thread.... FM is starting to do more and more procedures in the clinic because there is less and less need to refer them... Dermatology PAs will not be needed as much in the future if FM continues to take the turf that the Dermatologists refuse to commit to by refusing to increase their numbers.
This is clearly a turf war. Check it out.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/HEALTH/12/22/botox.at.the.mall.ap/index.html
😀 but, what I do remember is a series of planar warts all over my hands...probably from the HPV or something i got from living in military barracks for 3 years (yes I was a bad kid), and going to an FP for 2 years...it was horrible, that liquid nitrogen burning off method is mighty painful, i cried...several times, of course im a big wuss, but it was remarkable returning every 2 months or so to watch the bumbling idiot (not all FP's probably just this guy) say over and over again, well We will just try and burn it off again
This was getting ridiculous, maybe he was just trying to make a quick buck, i mean it took 5 minutes and i was out, finally after 2 years, reffered to a Dermatologist, interferon shot, 3 days later warts were gone, forever,
thusly and therefore vis a vis and concordantly, I wouldnt be worried about this procedure outsourcing issue, chances are FP's have there talents in the more general disease recognition and treatment, and when it comes to any specialized therapy they will have to refer elsewhere, suffice to say, I never went back to that FP again, and that happens a lot from what i hear
so keep cool,
izzy
New to this forum, but thought to mention a few things:
1) Turf wars are everywhere, even in my specialty in ENT:
Thyroidectomy: GSU, ENT
Skin Cancer removal: ENT, FP, PCP, Peds, PSU, GSU, Derm
Trach placement: GSU, ENT
G-tube placement: radiology, GSU, GI
Neck mass removal: GSU, ENT, oral surgery, PSU
etc, etc.
Turf wars are a part of life. If you provide a good service, patients will come, no matter what specialty you represent.
2) Derm is sometimes not the best ones to remove skin cancer. In fact, derm sometimes refers to ENT for skin cancer removal of the face, especially when it comes back SCC, deep BCC, etc since neck dissection/parotidectomy may be needed. In turn, ENT often refers to derm for skin cancer as well, esp if diffusely spread out.
Instead of viewing it as a turf war, consider it to be a service provided for patients and who would be the best to address a given problem. We are all colleagues and can benefit more from working with each other.
a series of planar warts all over my hands
i had the same exact case (12 plantars on my fingers!!)
Um, guys? The term "plantar wart" refers specifically to warts on the sole of the foot (from the Latin planta pedis), not on the hands.
Normally, I'd let that slide...but this is a derm forum, after all. 😉
Warts on the hands are typically described as being digital, palmar, or periungual, depending on their location.
palmar = hand
Aldara works great on all warts. I'm only a 3rd year so I just bite my cheek whenever I see an attending use nitro (seems to never work in my experience, and hurts obviously).
Just follow a simple rule: Am I the best person for the job? If not, will there be any real consequences to my action? If there could be, refer on to the person who you feel is best. It will work out the best for you and the patient in the end.
There is always someone "better" than an FP for any ailment you can name: HTN, infections, depression, and the list goes on. Patients realize this and hence the decline in the family physician.