- Joined
- Nov 28, 2005
- Messages
- 844
- Reaction score
- 77
Wow! Where do I begin on this one? First, a quick fact check. Although, it might be helpful to your argument to pick the smaller number - the Dallas-Ft. Worth Metroplex actually has a population of 6.5 million (4th largest in US) according to wikipedia. Second, since when do any two institutions have a monopoly on research? Any person with a cursory knowledge of the research world could tell you that UTSW produces significantly more impactful basic science research than MD Anderson, and generally the more people working on a topic the sooner a definitive answer will be reached.
I'm really trying to understand your clear contempt for UTSW, but I am having a hard time, especially when you skew the facts and make blanket generalizations without providing any real substance for your argument. "So what research would UTSW be doing that the 17+ protons centers ahead of them can't?" I would bet on 5 Nobel prize winners (more than any other medical school), 19 National academy members and 12 Howard Hughes Investigators, but that's just me. Facts!!
Dude, you're totally misunderstanding Wagy's post, which has really nothing to do with your future alma mater and is much more just a philosophical discussion of misallocation of resources within the system and not an attack on UTSW which I'm sure everyone agrees is a fantastic institution and a rising star in radonc specifically. No one is taking a dook on your diploma so cha-ill yo