publication = acceptance?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

ratherberocking

Full Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2007
Messages
175
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Cambridge, MA
  1. Pre-Medical
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
For top notch research med schools, if you have a decent gpa (3.7-3.8) and a decent mcat score, will a 1st author publication really make a big difference? I know a lot of schools are really into numbers and you have A LOT of students with 3.9s but without publications. I was wondering if a research would help. Thanks. Oh and this is especially for MD/PhD interest
 
gee I sure hope so lol
 
It probably helps some...I mean if you've done a significant amount of research (i.e. more than a summer program) then you would expect to be on one. Being first author is better, as it says you probably did most of the work on the project. But I don't think it's going to give you a definite acceptance to the school of your choice. It's a perk, yes, but it's not going to support a mediocre application.

That being said, I hafta say one of my biggest pet peeve about premeds are the ones that go shopping for a lab to find the one most likely to give them a paper or absolutely EXPECT to be put on a paper and publish. If you like research and you're actually contributing to a lab and do something that's publication worthy...that's great! But if your plan is to find a lab and do research just to get a paper to put on your resume when really you're just a lab monkey...

As for MD/PhD applicants...a good number of them have done a lot of research, far more than the average med student so while it's a good thing, it's definitely not going to be unique.
 
Yes it helps significantly for major research universities and yes it helps extremely for MD/PhD programs. I'd add an outstanding letter of recommendation from any PI or mentor you had as well.
 
Hey. Thanks for the post. Ive done research for the past two years and have worked on my own project. I'm writing the paper now and it should be submitted for review very soon. I have a sincere interest in research (MD/PhD all the way) and will apply next year. So, I was hoping that since I'll have the paper published by then (hopefully!), it will balance the 3.7-3.8 gpa.
 
you can check out my MDapps profile and see the mixed results of a shared first authorship...though my paper didn't come out until March of this year, near the end of the cycle, even though I kept bringing it up on interviews and updating them. Not sure how much the 'officially published' status affects things compared to just being submitted or in review, etc. My cycle still turned out decently, though, and it's hard to argue with in-state tuition...
 
Only Stanford specifically asks for publications. Other schools may give brownie points, but probably not as much as Stanford.
 
Anyone who's done research can tell you it's easy to get your name on a paper. But getting your name on a paper as a first author? That says something.
 
Anyone who's done research can tell you it's easy to get your name on a paper. But getting your name on a paper as a first author? That says something.

Depends on the topic, the paper, and the journal it's going to.
 
Top Bottom