Lasik is not without risks, risks are higher the more near-sighted a person is. I looked into, and decided the risk of permanent blindness/double vision/chronic migraine headaches was not worth the convenience of not wearing glasses. Actually, I like taking off my glasses sometimes, and seeing all the lights as blurry Christmas tree lights. ISHA2018 mentioned being strongly nearly sighted at -6....that is mild-moderate nearsightedness. My nearsightedness is moderate-severe (-12 & -13), severe would be more like -18. People with mild-moderate nearsightedness are much more likely to have good results than people with moderate & higher near-sightedness. I'd recommend considering your own degree of near-sightedness when deciding whether to get Lasix. It is also more imperative to pick a doctor who is equipped to give you chronic follow-up care, if you have moderate or higher near-sightedness, as the recovery is often not as smooth as for people with lesser near-sightedness and many times a 2nd "enhancement" surgery will be needed. As Corytrade me
ntioned, PRK is also worth looking into, it seems to have a better safety profile than Lasix (but longer recovery post-op), especially for people with moderate & higher near-sightedness.