-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
quick question
Started by sbEMT33
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
extremely minimal effect if any
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Quick answer: a little bit. Someone previously linked a page at Hopkins saying that their average admitted student was .1 below the overall average (~3.5 versus ~3.6). This was used to suggest that a tough school might give the students a .1 "boost".
Minimally. To give a supplementary example to JHU, at Brown, despite overall grade inflation, the average accepted GPA (3.64) is not that far off from the national average. (Source: http://brown.edu/academics/college/advising/health-careers/medical-admission-data-snapshot). One possibility/interpretation is that Brown is not getting docked for its inflation because of its above-average reputation.
Yes. For example, a 3.95 from Yale might be viewed as a stronger record than a 3.95 from Southern Connet-the-dots University just few miles away. Typically, the student from the higher ranked school also presents with the higher MCAT.
A very strong MCAT can shut up the naysayers who would criticize an applicant from a low tier undergrad institution.
🤣. You're Quinni-ck-to-act based on school name... ... I don't think I did that so well.
Regardless, I think the second bold part is key, and it's up to a committee member to take everything into account and make an informed decision with all factors accounted for. MCAT is important, GPA is important, school is important... but all of them together can say a lot about an applicant. A high GPA should be present with a high MCAT score, and one without the other is clearly a bit of a red flag (and could be partially accounted for with poor teaching/assessment at a "bad" undergrad institution).
That's interesting...will schools like Harvard Yale or Stanford be considered a tough school even though there are outside rumors that they grade inflate?
Here is the text from the Hopkins pre-health website:
I agree. Grade inflation doesn't seem to hurt applicants much. That's probably because grade inflated schools tend to be highly ranked and come with the prestige factor. They also have more competitive student bodies, so grade inflation might be more of a reflection of the quality of the students than of how easy the school is.
But this question is often irrelevant. As LizzyM said, adcoms will hesitate to give you credit for grade deflation if you bomb the MCAT, and adcoms certainly won't penalize you for grade inflation if you ace the MCAT. My advice: study well for the MCAT. That will matter more than grade inflation or deflation in the end.
Last edited:
Agree. Well said.
I've taken classes at a prestigious school, a 2nd tier school, and a state school. I think that even with the grade inflation issue, it was far more difficult to get As in the first two groups, because the student pool is just way more intense.
For instance I took OChem I at the prestigious school and OChem II at the state school. The OChem I class had pages upon pages of creative synthesis in the exams and required a relatively deep grasp of the material (which I was able to gauge because I later on became a chemistry major). In contrast I literally got multiple 100's on the exams at the state school, because they mostly tested for memorization and not comprehension. I think the expectations were just not the same.
But the middle-tier school, man, there is no grade inflation AND the class is hard, probably even harder than the top-tier school. My heart goes out to all the students who go to those.
I have also taken classes an an Ivy, a top private, and a top state school. I found the state school to be most difficult (mostly due to huge lectures not being so conducive to my learning/studying habits). Of course, your mileage may vary. 🙂 There are certainly differences in the school populations, but intelligent and competitive people can be found anywhere.
I can definitely see that--I am not a lecture person in general and prefer to study on my own, so this wasn't an issue for me. I did observe that in very large lectures (the case for intro science everywhere, I think) the professor has to try to make the material accessible for everybody and it can become a lowest-common-denominator problem. So then the lecture material cannot be quite the same even if the top quintile of both populations might be similar.
But I guess that is why we have standardized tests, however flawed they might be.
