- Joined
- Dec 13, 2011
- Messages
- 267
- Reaction score
- 11
- Points
- 4,676
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Hello,
I am having quite of bit of trouble understanding example 3.2. The link is below:
I get that I have to number from highest priority to lowest priority. I just don't get why my approach( that is going from group 1 to 2 bypassing group 3). Under this assumption, I was thinking that the molecule is actually S . .but its not.
So why is my approach wrong? and why is Berkley's right? They went from priority #1 to #4.
http://i1072.photobucket.com/albums/w371/Goldeolde/IMAG0206.jpg
Help would be awesome!
Thanks much!
I am having quite of bit of trouble understanding example 3.2. The link is below:
I get that I have to number from highest priority to lowest priority. I just don't get why my approach( that is going from group 1 to 2 bypassing group 3). Under this assumption, I was thinking that the molecule is actually S . .but its not.
So why is my approach wrong? and why is Berkley's right? They went from priority #1 to #4.
http://i1072.photobucket.com/albums/w371/Goldeolde/IMAG0206.jpg
Help would be awesome!
Thanks much!