- Joined
- Apr 3, 2019
- Messages
- 4,787
- Reaction score
- 11,041
You can’t spell “mentorship” without “men”!Noticed that the term “mentorship” is starting to be thrown around. It smacks of “grooming.”
You can’t spell “mentorship” without “men”!Noticed that the term “mentorship” is starting to be thrown around. It smacks of “grooming.”
Lol
@Gfunk6 and @CurbYourExpectations are certified geniuses hahaha Both of ya’ll hilariousLol
Fighting SDN by daylight
Building protons by moonlight
Always running from the real fight
They are the ones called Rad Onc chairs
Mortal kobat “finish him!” Voice in background
The basket should be jobs and the guy in blue is a PGY5
Harden looking like he was shot with zero contact. Shocked!
I do PCI to make other rad oncs mad, some med oncs really mad, and all the LS-SCLC patients live longer
I generally just let the patient tell me to omit it.I do PCI to make other rad oncs mad, some med oncs really mad, and all the LS-SCLC patients live longer
Forgive my ignorance.
So true... Definitely a big issue right now with poaching from surrounding practices, treat your staff/physicist really well, speaking of, time to go get him a bottle of Blanton's for xmasHiring a medical physicist is almost impossible right now. Which is great for them in the short term. Medium term, it definitely wouldn't surprise me if hospitals just said F-it and outsourced/automated most of those jobs away.
It's not that bad in Europe and I think the rise of AI as well as increasing automation of a lot of things that physicists used to do manually, may cause a shrinkage in the necessary workforce. But we are clearly not there yet.So true... Definitely a big issue right now with poaching from surrounding practices, treat your staff/physicist really well, speaking of, time to go get him a bottle of Blanton's for xmas
Physicists have sold many of us the line that per-patient IMRT QA must be done, forever... because safety. In reality it's probably because: (physicist) job security. Hope it goes away someday. Many academic institutions have abandoned the per-patient QA process FWIW.We automated our breast planning to IMRT from FnF, and that caused an increase in physics workload by a fair amount actually, just due to the increased plan QA needs. I agree with Palex - not there yet.
I've heard that it comes down to have an independent third-party verification? Rather the software just spits out what the machine says and is part of the Linacs in house software?Physicists have sold many of us the line that per-patient IMRT QA must be done, forever... because safety. In reality it's probably because: (physicist) job security. Hope it goes away someday. Many academic institutions have abandoned the per-patient QA process FWIW.
![]()
Totally. Have worked at places that do both.Physicists have sold many of us the line that per-patient IMRT QA must be done, forever... because safety. In reality it's probably because: (physicist) job security. Hope it goes away someday. Many academic institutions have abandoned the per-patient QA process FWIW.
![]()
#freezingcoldtakesIt would be incredibly smart for the company to give genesis so many for cheap. This is how it happens.
It will take sometime but now that they have a clinical trial they can POINT to (unlike what we have seen in proton) there will be patients wanting this. Get ready to compete against your local genesis. Then next thing you know your hospital is getting one.
These mri Linac companies are doing it well.
I think the joke is .. fine .. but I’ve never once supported artificial regulations prop up the job market.
In today's competitive job market, we understand the challenges companies face, especially when it comes to hiring when budgets are tight. The good news is, your organization doesn't have to compromise on the quality of radiation oncology professionals you seek. We at the ASTRO Radiation Oncology Career Center have a solution tailored just for you.
is Viewray afloat?
I mean, technically, the corpses in Walking Dead can also float...is Viewray afloat?