- Joined
- Sep 20, 2004
- Messages
- 11,727
- Reaction score
- 11,815
Would happy to have inpatient coverage...errrr, provide inpatient "teaching experience" on symptomatic/palliative onc patientsI have a fellowship I'd like to pitch to you....
Would happy to have inpatient coverage...errrr, provide inpatient "teaching experience" on symptomatic/palliative onc patientsI have a fellowship I'd like to pitch to you....
Maybe I'm a dismissive dingus but the concept that palliative RT is some sort of art that requires its own discipline just doesn't resonate with me.
But I also get bored by breast radiation so maybe it's just me.
best... worst... distaff... idkBreast is the worst! Do you treat whole breast or regional nodal? If so do you do standard or hypofx?
Contour a breast, maybe some lymph nodes and boom you’re done! Of course we will all debate on these topics but it really is the same thing day in and day out.
Shoot me now. Can I do whatever I want as long as I put “phase 1/2” in front of it?best... worst... distaff... idk
Prediction:
“Same thing day in and day out” will be “same thing day in” in a few years...
Stereotactic image-guided neoadjuvant ablative single-dose radiation, then lumpectomy, for early breast cancer: the SIGNAL prospective single-arm trial of single-dose radiation therapy
Adjuvant whole-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery, typically delivered over several weeks, is the traditional standard of care for low-risk breast cancer. More recently, hypofractionated, partial-breast irradiation has increasingly become ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Wallner: "I AM THE ABR" (said to the tone of "I am the Senate")Eh, I kinda read that as Ralph and Siker basically being like "who cares that US grads aren't applying for rad onc anymore?"... which ties into the whole "Rad Onc should be more diverse than just US MDs, so the increase of DOs, FMGs, and IMGs is a good thing for the field!!11"
These folks who love the "increased diversity of applicants" (meaning groups that historically would not have had the academic credentials to match) in Rad Onc will love to work with all the folks who would not have had a chance in Rad Onc as recently as 5 years ago.... all the DOs, IMGs, and Ophtho/derm/ortho rejects. SOAP numbers will look better for the field next year as word will get out that all you need to match rad onc is a pulse and no obvious gigantic red flags.
That's what folks in academics are hanging their hat on. The same folks who would throw a US MD without double digit publications or a 240 in the trash as recently as 5-10 years ago will be bending the knee and interviewing every applicant, including the DO/IMG with no publications and average step scores.
And then, to the academic folks, all will be back to normal, and thus no (painful) changes will need to be made for the health of the specialty.
And somewhere, Paul Wallner will laugh a great hearty laugh similar to Emperor Palpatine, having summarily predicted the downfall of the quality of the average Radiation Oncology resident. Perhaps it's not just a prediction, and Paul Wallner is Chancellor Palpatine orchestrating the Clone Wars as a means to an end - the extermination of the Jedi. What that is analogous to in the current situation is.... unknown. But maybe it will be just as much of a shocker as Order 66 was when we (eventually) got around to watching Episode 3.
Won't change a thing, I'm telling you now. As long as others control the diagnostic processes and push their agenda, RT will always be in the backseat. Happens for prostate all the time, will happen for early stage lung SBRT too.VALOR can potentially change the game for us in perception as long as SBRT is equivalent (doesn't need to be better)
Lung probably easier than prostate... Pcps and Pulmonary often involved before they see a Thoracic Surgeon, esp Pulmonary. I sometimes get SBRT referrals straight from them when the pfts are terribleWon't change a thing, I'm telling you now. As long as others control the diagnostic processes and push their agenda, RT will always be in the backseat. Happens for prostate all the time, will happen for early stage lung SBRT too.
And nearly all pulmonary docs know absolutely nothing to do with these pts than to reflexively refer them to a surgeon. SMH.Lung probably easier than prostate... Pcps and Pulmonary often involved before they see a Thoracic Surgeon, esp Pulmonary. I sometimes get SBRT referrals straight from them when the pfts are terrible
And nearly all pulmonary docs know absolutely nothing to do with these pts than to reflexively refer them to a surgeon. SMH.
Won't change a thing, I'm telling you now. As long as others control the diagnostic processes and push their agenda, RT will always be in the backseat. Happens for prostate all the time, will happen for early stage lung SBRT too.
Wallner: "I AM THE ABR" (said to the tone of "I am the Senate")
Won't change a thing, I'm telling you now. As long as others control the diagnostic processes and push their agenda, RT will always be in the backseat. Happens for prostate all the time, will happen for early stage lung SBRT too.
And nearly all pulmonary docs know absolutely nothing to do with these pts than to reflexively refer them to a surgeon. SMH.
This. Much harder in an entrenched/employed/academic system, but out in the real world, it doesn't hurt to network with Pulmonary and let them know where to send those COPDers with clinically early stage disease with poor dlco/fev1's.... Definitely can get referrals that wayIt really varies based on your practice structure.
In private with entrenched systems, maybe not
But academics or pseudoacademics, where all pts are discussed then possibly yes.
Hypocrisy of Fumiko chino continues
MSKCC among those that charge $$$ for parking
While I agree with sentiment, should fix your own house first
Hypocrisy of Fumiko chino continues
MSKCC among those that charge $$$ for parking
While I agree with sentiment, should fix your own house first
Hypocrisy of Fumiko chino continues
MSKCC among those that charge $$$ for parking
While I agree with sentiment, should fix your own house first
Yup, plenty of out of town "destination" patients going to Sloane and Anderson I'd imagineIn reality, they take mostly premium insurances that are out of reach of someone who has difficulty affording parking (which is probably 40$+ a visit).
Hypocrisy of Fumiko chino continues
MSKCC among those that charge $$$ for parking
While I agree with sentiment, should fix your own house first
it's hard to take her seriously if she doesn't really make changes at MSKCC first.
The faculty at an institution have no ability to change the parking prices. Maybe by bringing public attention to it like this, it might help. I doubt it though.
First step is identifying the problem? I knew parking could be an issue, but didn't know it could be up to $1400.
I don't know Fumiko personally, but the vibe I get from her is that she genuinely cares about her patients and financial toxicity. Perhaps I am blinded by the Twitter virtue-signalling? The irony is definitely glaring - an advocate of financial health for patients while working at M$KCC. I guess one could argue that if she can minimize financial burden of her patients within the MSKCC system, she is probably saving each patient more absolute dollars. (Could also argue that if she really cared, she would be sending standard XRT cases to high quality community practices). Perhaps working at MSKCC, she is in an environment with high financial toxicity that can be studied? Lol.
I just don't think I want to give her a hard time over this. Some people see hypocrisy. I see her sticking out her neck and calling out her employer for crazy parking fees.
Perhaps I’m being cynical
But then again I still remember when there was mention of unnecessary EKG at MSKCC for breast cancer patients and then suddenly POOF it was gone
I also don’t see a list of actual names that are charging too high. Just saying overall 1/3. Perhaps to avoid angering anyone?
Also curious no response to this question below...
This is not true. A rad onc dept I was at previously got free parking for rad onc patients, it was negotiated by the dept chair. Worked out some kind of deal with the president.The faculty at an institution have no ability to change the parking prices. Maybe by bringing public attention to it like this, it might help. I doubt it though.
Say what you will about Fumiko but I'm not getting on that next level respect until she makes a tweet like "Did you know that some people with #cancer may be paying up to $1400 in PARKING?"....
and then tags it with a nice #radoncrocks.
needs to @therealdonaldtrump to earn my respect.
First step is identifying the problem? I knew parking could be an issue, but didn't know it could be up to $1400.
I don't know Fumiko personally, but the vibe I get from her is that she genuinely cares about her patients and financial toxicity. Perhaps I am blinded by the Twitter virtue-signalling? The irony is definitely glaring - an advocate of financial health for patients while working at M$KCC. I guess one could argue that if she can minimize financial burden of her patients within the MSKCC system, she is probably saving each patient more absolute dollars. (Could also argue that if she really cared, she would be sending standard XRT cases to high quality community practices). Perhaps working at MSKCC, she is in an environment with high financial toxicity that can be studied? Lol.
I just don't think I want to give her a hard time over this. Some people see hypocrisy. I see her sticking out her neck and calling out her employer for crazy parking fees.
Yeah I also agree that she seems genuine.
She's brand-new junior faculty pushing concepts which shouldn't be controversial but have a high controversial potential because MURICA under her own name on Twitter. Meanwhile, I just nod my head when my Chair says there's no such thing as resident oversupply. She's got skin in the game and it'll take a long time for her to incur change.
Now, if, in 15 years, it still seems like virtue signaling - that's something else.
I also don't know her personally, but Fumiko is 100% genuine. I don't think that she would be upset that the article below is shared (particularly because it was reported by a major news organization), but her motivations for this type of work are very personal. It's not careerism. Sometimes the voices of the well-intentioned get mixed up in the shuffle of #radoncrocks, but we absolutely shouldn't go after someone like this.
Widowed Early, A Cancer Doctor Writes About The Harm Of Medical Debt
A decade after the death of her husband, Fumiko Chino is studying the strain that uncovered medical costs put on cancer patients, even those who have insurance.www.npr.org
I strongly agree that she is doing her research for the right reasons, that's plainly obvious. She's a tremendous advocate for patients.
However, from an economists's standpoint (remember, it is 'the dismal science') the issue is that by focusing on costs but not cleaning your own house first (or at least working in that direction), all you are essentially doing is asking your competitors to reduce their revenue. This is truly an area where "lead by example" becomes critical. I sincerely hope MSKCC gives her the power to affect real change so they may do so.
UW is a known bad program with tons of scut. pay attention folks!
Recent resident experience would seem to confirm that on Twitter:
Geezi find that i have to repeat myself a lot on here. I warned about breadlines. i warned this was a bad no good place. I ask People to reconsider, perhaps people know something about something? I mean what do i know. Know nothing here. Am i even a rad onc?
Looks like TIMESUP in rad onc folks. Post names. The pitchforks are coming.
country club secret handshake good old boy rad onc crew know what is coming.
What did I just say?!?!