- Joined
- May 22, 2009
- Messages
- 73
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi, just some quick random questions on CS. Any advice is appreciated.
1. Are we expected to do some of the more time intensive or complex exam procedures like orthostatics, 2 arm BPs, Dix-Hallpike, etc or can we just list them on our note as diagnostic studies
2. In FA they are very exhaustive on suggested studies (bronchoalveolar lavage for simple bronchitis, ceruloplasmin for tremor) but on the USMLE examples they seem much more restricted to evidence based style. Is it good to list several extra studies if they are possible to help but unlikely or should we keep it simple?
3. I've read you're supposed to explain each exam before doing it but keep it in laymen's terms, what do you suggest for conjunctival pallor (exam takes 0.5 seconds, explaining it would take a while without scientific terms)
4. Do we mark negative findings for the diseases in the note, or do they just assume we know that it's negative if we type it in? (ex: no relation of pain to food if cholelithiasis is your #3 differential)
1. Are we expected to do some of the more time intensive or complex exam procedures like orthostatics, 2 arm BPs, Dix-Hallpike, etc or can we just list them on our note as diagnostic studies
2. In FA they are very exhaustive on suggested studies (bronchoalveolar lavage for simple bronchitis, ceruloplasmin for tremor) but on the USMLE examples they seem much more restricted to evidence based style. Is it good to list several extra studies if they are possible to help but unlikely or should we keep it simple?
3. I've read you're supposed to explain each exam before doing it but keep it in laymen's terms, what do you suggest for conjunctival pallor (exam takes 0.5 seconds, explaining it would take a while without scientific terms)
4. Do we mark negative findings for the diseases in the note, or do they just assume we know that it's negative if we type it in? (ex: no relation of pain to food if cholelithiasis is your #3 differential)