- Joined
- Jul 27, 2010
- Messages
- 1,814
- Reaction score
- 1,526
Today I was checking my google scholar alerts and this article came through:
A Randomized Controlled Study of a Psychoeducation Group Intervention for Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder.
As I read the abstract, I noticed this line:
For the past hour, I have been questioning whether I have completely misunderstood (and in turn have taught) the term "randomized" incorrectly for all these years. Or this is another example of glaring problems with the peer-review process.
Am I taking ****oo pills?
A Randomized Controlled Study of a Psychoeducation Group Intervention for Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder.
A Clinical Trial of a Psychoeducation Group Intervention for Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder - PubMed
This study shows that a PEG intervention can be an effective treatment for patients with BPD. The overall cost benefits of group interventions and the the applicability of a PEG intervention to underserved patients demonstrate its potential to address significant public health needs.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
As I read the abstract, I noticed this line:
"Of 96 outpatients who met DSM-IV criteria for BPD, the first 48 received the experimental treatment, whereas the next 48 were assigned to a wait list."
For the past hour, I have been questioning whether I have completely misunderstood (and in turn have taught) the term "randomized" incorrectly for all these years. Or this is another example of glaring problems with the peer-review process.
Am I taking ****oo pills?