Here's some responses for the sports conversation (by the way, I love that people here have turned a question about US News rankings into a sports forum!)
In regard to Stanford: I am aware that they are tops in all-around athletic performance. Still, I think places like Michigan and UCLA are better places to be a student spectator. Stanford's best big-time sport (traditionally) is baseball, which isn't that exciting to most student spectators. Their basketball is awesome now, but it won't be for long. Their football team struggles in most years.
In regard to UCLA: I think that when you look at schools that combine awesome athletics with awesome academics, UCLA and Michigan are the most similar, and are the best. Both have great football traditions, UCLA is the best all-time in basketball, Michigan is the best all-time in hockey, and both schools are considered among the very best (in general and in medicine) academically.
Which reminds me, Jamie, you wanna know who can hang with UK in basketball??? I have four letters for you... U-C-L-A. Eleven national championships, which is precisely four more than your precious Wildcats.
And as for you Big 12 football fans, buy a box of tissues and start your crying now, because the party is OVER - the Huskers are hungry, and healthy, and they're gonna shred the entire league just like the good ol' days!