I am trying to improve on RC. Currently I am using the Kaplan method of writing down key words in each paragraph of the passage. Curious, do any of you use the same method? Had success with it? What other techniques are you using?
I am trying to improve on RC. Currently I am using the Kaplan method of writing down key words in each paragraph of the passage. Curious, do any of you use the same method? Had success with it? What other techniques are you using?
In this method you read through the paragraphs and write down the key words, key figures and stats, and anything that you feel is important. When you're done reading the entire passage, you refer to your notes to locate the proper paragraph that contains the answer to a particular question.can you explain the Kaplan method..
i have the latest Kaplan book and it didnt say anything about this...
In this method you read through the paragraphs and write down the key words, key figures and stats, and anything that you feel is important. When you're done reading the entire passage, you refer to your notes to locate the proper paragraph that contains the answer to a particular question.
This method simply didn't work for me the first time (RC 18). I think it's extremely time consuming, because you're wasting time writing down stuff that may not provide you with the answer to any of the questions.
I personally prefer Seek and Destroy (search the forum for more details on this), and my RC scores improved dramatically during my 2nd DAT (RC 23).
It worked for all my practice exams and my DAT. Some people say it doesn't work on the Piano passage, but I haven't seen that passage, so I can't comment on it.Do you think S&D will work for any RC passages?
Did you get frap or piano pssg in the 3rd one?! If not, I guess you got the better score because ur not frapped or pianoed-I used the kaplan method the first two times...16 (frap) then 17 (piano) so obviously it didn't work for me. The 3rd time I used search and destroy and got a 22.
However, if yes ur frapped or pianoed in the 3rd again, I agree w/ ya (using S&D method)-Kaplan just seemed like a waste of time to me, but if it works for you then do it!
Wrong!Thanks for the input everyone!!! So, it seems everyone is in agreement with S&D. Now, I will do a practice passage tonight or tomorrow morning using S&D only. So correct me if I'm wrong, but skim EACH paragraph (without writing anything down), and THEN go to the questions....correct???
I personally prefer Seek and Destroy
ok i dont get how this search and destroy stuff works
i just tried it and did poorly.. the questions are NOT asked in the order that they appear in the passage.. so how does it help to read the question.. read the passage.. answer.. read the next question.. read the passage.. answer.. etc ?
😎
I'm guessing 19+ (Not sure though). Nevertheless, the important part is that you feel more comfortable with this method than the other one!So....just took a RC practice test utilizing the S&D approach (instead of writing key words, dates, etc.) and liked it much better. For my first time, I scored 37/50. Does anyone have an idea of what that score would be???
Do you guys remember on average how many paragraphs exist on the real DAT? Is it comparative in length and difficulty to the practice DAT passage, "Ionizing Radiation:Risk and Benefit"
Which practice test is this from?