Reading Textbooks

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

tae1703

Senior Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2003
Messages
264
Reaction score
0
Ok. I started the MI semester reading the textbooks and found out very quick that it is impossible. There are just too many: anatomy, embryo, biochem, histo. those are the main ones. Any thoughts? I'm guessing it might be a general trend among students to only read certain books. Or maybe dont read any and only use books for figures, etc while studying only lecture notes.
 
Ok. I started the MI semester reading the textbooks and found out very quick that it is impossible. There are just too many: anatomy, embryo, biochem, histo. those are the main ones. Any thoughts? I'm guessing it might be a general trend among students to only read certain books. Or maybe dont read any and only use books for figures, etc while studying only lecture notes.

Impossible may indicate that you are spending too much time trying to read and memorize at the same time. I always pre-read before a lecture, mostly to get the big "picture" and to know what was in the book so that I wouldn't waste time trying to take notes on these things. Most textbooks are nicely organized so that you can either "summary read" or intensively read. Before lecture, I was a summary reader.

Most of my intensive reading was from the syllabus, which I also previewed before the lecture. By making sure that I had solidly reviewed all of the objectives of the upcoming lecture, I could listen with a keen ear for how the important material was covered in lecture. In the evening, I would learn the lecture, using the text to supplement as needed.

In courses like Physiology and Pathology, the diagrams and figures were very important for learning and organizing the material. Again, I didn't read trying to memorize or study the text but used it as a tool to clarify and summarize lecture and syllabus points.

At my school, anything in lecture, handout, syllabus or assigned reading in text was fair game for the exam. After the first rounds of tests, we realized how to ratchet up or cut back on what we covered. You adjust to getting to the place that you need but minimally, I covered the bold headings, the captions under figures and diagrams and the summaries before lecture so that I knew where the lecture was going. I never went to a lecture cold or used review books for study until USMLE Step I time.

I hope that this helps.
 
I used textbooks really selectively. I used review books for studying and pre-reading and only turned to the big texts as a supplement to lectures that were unclear or in subjects that seemed to be passed over by the review books. In the end, I really only used Lehninger's biochem (because that was a hard subject for me) and Robbins Basic Pathology (because I liked it). For the rest of my courses I stayed with review books and class handouts only. If a textbook just doesn't work for you forcing yourself through it isn't going to help the information go in your head. Figure out which review series are easy for you to read and internalize and stick with the books that work best for you.
 
Top