Reapplicant Review Priority

[DoctorFate]

---

Members don't see this ad.

To adcoms, or any others with insight, how does being a reapplicant affect the review priority of your application? For the adcoms, could you share what your institution does?

 

[KnightDoc]

To adcoms, or any others with insight, how does being a reapplicant affect the review priority of your application? For the adcoms, could you share what your institution does?

I'll leave it to the adcoms to give a definitive answer, but I have never heard anyone say reapplicant status is a metric used in review priority, one way or the other. Your priority is whatever it would be otherwise. Being a reapplicant typically just involves having the jump through the additional hoop of having your application compared to a prior one, and typically needing to show material improvement to be considered.

 

[Catalystik]

To adcoms, or any others with insight, how does being a reapplicant affect the review priority of your application? For the adcoms, could you share what your institution does?

In regards to review priority, at my school a reapplicant has no disadvantage compared to a new applicant. n=1.

 

[Goro]

To adcoms, or any others with insight, how does being a reapplicant affect the review priority of your application? For the adcoms, could you share what your institution does?

At my school, it doesn't affect priority. But in the interview, you will very likely be asked about how you improved since the last time you applied.

 

[Proudfather94]

To adcoms, or any others with insight, how does being a reapplicant affect the review priority of your application? For the adcoms, could you share what your institution does?

I got dragged along by Toledo last cycle and got an II from them a few days ago. N=1 but I don't think being a reapplicant matters in order of priority.