Does anyone know if Stanford, ucla, or ucsd have sent out interviews for their regional anesthesiology fellowships yet?
I have a feeling most people who do these fellowships come from a mediocre program and just wanna get a certificate/diploma from Stanford or something and put it on their resume. The only fellowship where you really learn something novel is pain. The rest you should’ve had enough exposure in residency to be competent enough to practice it, with a little help from your colleagues in the beginning.
Some residents might want to practice in a certain location but have no network connections in that area and would use the fellowship to remedy that. I agree that we all should be able to learn regional blocks without a fellowship.
Did a regional fellowship at UCSD. It was honestly a huge waste of a year (and rather miserable time). They have a bunch of people that drop out mid-year. If I had to go back in time, I would definitely not have done a regional fellowship. Jobs are so aplenty, and you can learn regional enough in residency and on the job.
Some residents might want to practice in a certain location but have no network connections in that area and would use the fellowship to remedy that. I agree that we all should be able to learn regional blocks without a fellowship.
I thought it made sense to be an "expert" in something. Poor reason as it turns out. Regional just isn't something you need to sacrifice a year in order to proficiently practice.Why did you do it?
One of my classmates is doing a non-accredited regional fellowship at a 'top tier' center in a VHCOL area. 2-3 days in the OR as faculty. They will pay her 130-140k a year with 5-6 weeks of vacation . I tried my hardest to convince her to drop it but to no avail. What a scam!