No, I'm not sensitive, no more than you are ignorant.
"Homo" is short for homosexual, I'm glad we established the straw man in your argument. However, calling someone a "homo" is CERTAINLY offensive, and is consistently used in the vernacular AS an insult, and therefore no, in conversation, "homo" is NOT an acceptable abbreviation for someone of the opposite sex. To say otherwise is to demonstrate an insensitivity, ignorance, and naivete that has no place in a professional environment.
Ok, did you not read what I said the first time and what i had to repeat a second time, i was talking about spocks avatar because i KNEW his avatar was a joke and saying HOMO in joking terms. As i repeated before, i would never call someone homo.
For example,
"Sally is SO homo." This is an offensive term, and Sally would probably think that was an insult. Correctly, it would be stated, "Sally is a homosexual (lesbian)." This is not offensive.
If i were to say "sally is SO homosexual" i'm pretty sure the implications would be the same
Let's re-write the scenario.
Phoenician said, "Dude, your avatar is SO black."
This post would be reported to kingdom come - Why? Because racial epithets are not accepted very readily by society. However, slurs and derisive comments aimed at homosexuals as "undesirables" in society are, by and large, tolerated. Except in professional settings such as SDN, where we are held to a standard of conduct.
Imagine I was a homosexual man seeking advice as a pre-pharmacy student. I may be hurt by such a statement, and Phoenician may or may not have meant any insult toward me personally. However, the damage is done. And I'm quite shocked that your HR folks haven't ever put you through an ethics class, that you've never taken an ethics class, or that you've never had a racial/sexual orientation diversity course/class. Shocking...
Once again, i was talking about the avatar, i didn't say spock is a homo. "'im quite shocked that your hr folks haven't put you through an ethics class" ????? hahahah we dont' get "put" through ethics classes, we LEARN ethics as we encounter it.
This is patently offensive and bordering on trolling. No, my "association" with homosexuality was not out of any insult, it is because I was offended by such a rude comment.
I'd like you to take a minute and read your replies for what they are before calling me "offensive." Seeing as how you've associated my joke-comment with me being an unethical, insensitive jerk.
His avatar is not "homo", using Antimony's definition, it possesses no sexual orientation. You agreed with a guy that suggested a definition of a word that actually contradicts what you were saying, unless you'd like to state that you think Spock's avatar possesses a sex, either male or female, in which case I could direct you to some excellent therapists.
I think 2 men bathing and touching each other is "homo," maybe i will learn more about this in the ethics class.
Bottom line, "homo" is not an acceptable adjective on SDN nor should it be in ANY professional setting.
If you use such terms in your every day interactions with your friends, more power to you. However, such comments can be, and are, quite offensive to many people, including me.
I will continue to use "homo" as an adjective on sdn, thanks