- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 3,247
- Reaction score
- 2,850
Anybody else see this article in Annals ? It really pissed me off. It's a great example of physicians 'beating up' on each other for things outside of their control (mostly). It also ignores the futility of medicine (yes, some medicine is futile). How on earth would changing AMA to BMA ('before medical advice') affect anything?
Did make me wonder though: how do you all deal with AMA discharges? Do you write a DC summary, order meds? Or do you refrain from doing such things, because in so doing, you may be condoning the patient's ill decision? Does your institution give you crap for AMA discharges? [Mine doesn't, we're way too busy.]
And what are we supposed to do, how much time and effort are we supposed to devote to these patients, when there are plenty of other sick people that do want our help???
What a load of crap . . .
Retiring the “Against Medical Advice” Discharge
Robert A. Kleinman, MD
,
Thomas D. Brothers, MD
, and
Nathaniel P. Morris, MD
Author, Article, and Disclosure Information
https://doi.org/10.7326/M22-2964
Full Text
Tools
Share
Most clinicians are familiar with the following scenario: A patient hospitalized with a serious illness asks to leave. The patient's illness would likely improve with further treatment, but despite entreaties from the clinical team, the patient wishes to go. Following hospital policy, a clinician asks the patient to sign a form describing the risks of leaving, and the patient scribbles a signature. The team completes discharge paperwork and indicates that the discharge was “against medical advice,” or “AMA.” We believe it is time to retire the “AMA” designation.
Against medical advice discharges are common, particularly among patients facing socioeconomic disadvantages. ...