Rise of Mid-Level Podiatry

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

HalluxSlicer

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
There has recently been a rise in what could be described as “mid-level podiatry,” with nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) increasingly being recruited by both hospital systems and private equity groups for non-operative podiatry positions. These institutions often employ podiatrists as well; however, many of these positions appear to be non-operative roles that are being used to replace older podiatrists who are retiring or otherwise leaving the workforce.

The creation of these positions appears to be driven largely by both orthopedic and podiatric leadership. The responsibilities assigned to NPs and PAs can encompass many of the functions traditionally performed by non-operative podiatrists—and, in some settings, potentially more—because these providers may practice under broader institutional or state-defined scopes of practice than podiatrists whose practice has become restricted by hospital-system policies.

There have also been discussions regarding [redacted] podiatry school(s) developing two-week “boot camps” or certification programs intended to train NPs and PAs in podiatric care, potentially further expanding this workforce.

These developments raise significant concerns about the future of the podiatric profession. At the same time that mid-level providers are increasingly entering areas traditionally occupied by non-operative podiatrists, podiatry has faced declining school admissions, an abundance of residency and fellowship positions with varying degrees of standardization, and limited opportunities for young podiatrists following graduation. Some new graduates are consequently turning to less desirable mobile-podiatry models or private equity employment, while the profession continues to face concerns regarding market saturation and inadequate reimbursement.

Taken together, these trends raise serious questions about the long-term sustainability and professional identity of podiatry. Without meaningful changes to reimbursement, scope of practice, training standardization, workforce planning, and the integration of podiatry within health systems, the profession risks continuing down a trajectory that could substantially diminish opportunities for future podiatrists.

See below for an example from a Mayo Clinic job advertisement illustrating this trend.

Responsibilities

The Department of Orthopedic Surgery, in collaboration with Primary Care, is seeking a Nurse Practitioner or Physician Assistant to join the Podiatry team. The selected candidate will practice independently in an outpatient clinical setting, providing comprehensive foot and nail care services to employee and community Mayo Clinic patients within the designated Rochester campus locations.

This position practices within the Podiatry service and is administratively aligned with and reports through Primary Care. Responsibilities include diabetic and high-risk foot evaluations, toenail trimming and debridement, toenail avulsion procedures, corn and callus paring, wart treatment (including cryotherapy), patient education regarding foot care, and recommendations for appropriate footwear and orthotics. The role also includes the evaluation and nonsurgical management of foot and ankle conditions.

Qualifications

Nurse Practitioner: Masters-prepared graduate of an accredited school of nursing and Nurse Practitioner program. Current Minnesota RN and APRN license and certification as a

  • Family Nurse Practitioner Certification (FNP)
  • Adult Nurse Practitioner Certification (ANP)
  • Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Certification (ACNP)
  • Adult-Gerontology Primary Care Nurse Practitioner Certification (AGNP or AGPCNP)
  • Adult-Gerontology Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Certification (AGACNP or ACNPC-AG)
Physician Assistant: Graduate of accredited Physician Assistant program with current PA certification by NCCPA and registration as a PA by the Minnesota State Board of Medical Practice.

Registration with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) is required. BLS, is required.

External and Internal candidates for this position are asked to attach 2-3 letters of reference to their online application to be considered for this position.

New graduates please upload 3 letters of reference from preceptors that can attest to your clinical abilities.

Mayo Clinic employees applying for this position are asked to attach 3 most recent performance evaluations to online application to be considered for this position.

Exemption Status

Exempt

Compensation Detail

$119,870.40 - $167,273.60

Benefits Eligible

No

Schedule

Full Time

Hours/Pay Period

80

Schedule Details

Monday - Friday
 
That $120k-167k is pay of most podiatry associates... significantly more per hour if the 80hr/2wks is true.

We had a local med asst who got into PA school. I told them congrats. I had to filter "congrats on being a permanent resident" (as they just do the easy/middle acuity indefinitely), but with pay higher than a lot of DPMs with less than half the debt burden (and ability to change your "specialty"), it's a viable career, decent ROI.

And last, I doubt most PAs and NPs want to go into podiatry. There might be a few hospiatl positions like that, but any PP would just hire an associate DPM with more skill for roughly same money (or lower-paid RN if they wanted pure RFC help).

President GIF
 
That $120k-167k is pay of most podiatry associates... significantly more per hour if the 80hr/2wks is true.

We had a local med asst who got into PA school. I told them congrats. I had to filter "congrats on being a permanent resident" (as they just do the easy/middle acuity indefinitely), but with pay higher than a lot of DPMs with less than half the debt burden (and ability to change your "specialty"), it's a viable career, decent ROI.
Despite being perma-resident, PAs seem to have much greater outlook in their profession, to include ability to change specialities rather easily and the strong AAPA lobbying power. PAs currently are well sought after compared to NPs as there has been a large volume of degree mill-online NP programs that are churning out NPs. Guess what? Private Equity like Upperline will hire these NPs in a heart beat, placing them at equal level / pay as DPMs, perhaps like you mentioned @Feli with decent ROI
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
There are several podiatry NP job listings where the salary is actually higher than what many podiatrists are being offered. It is honestly sad and disappointing to see where this profession is heading.

NPs already have a broader scope of practice than podiatrists in many areas, and in many states they can practice independently.

It would be an incredibly dumb decision for podiatry schools to start training NPs and PAs who could eventually compete with or replace podiatrists. But at this point, I would not even be surprised if they did it.

The schools care about enrollment, tuition, and keeping the money coming in. As long as the school stays open and everyone keeps getting their paycheck, they do not seem concerned about what happens to the job market for graduates.

The leadership of this profession does not appear to care enough about the future of young podiatrists either. If they did, there would at least be a serious discussion about limiting the number of new podiatry graduates each year based on actual workforce demand.

Instead, the strategy seems to be: keep opening seats, keep producing graduates, saturate the market, and then tell everyone the solution is another fellowship.

The more desperate new grads there are, the cheaper they become.

Great system.
 
The more real statement is that they are not taking podiatrist jobs. They're doing things that podiatrists at least three year trained modern podiatrist, should not be doing. ie Nailcare.

If you're worried about a nurse practitioner taking some of your business, I'm sorry. If you're worried about even a nail care nurse taking some of your business. I'm really sorry.
 
This is exactly why I have a hard time believing these studies saying we are short 400 or so podiatrists in Florida. Are we actually short podiatrists or are we short people providing foot care?

If one of my kids was dead set on doing podiatry but didn't really care about surgery, I'd probably tell them to become an ARNP and open a general practice. PCPs and urgent care docs already treat plantar fasciitis, give injections, do matrixectomies, treat wounds, etc. Become really good at treating the foot and ankle stuff you can treat and refer out the rest.

Why spend 4 years in podiatry school and then another 3 years in a surgical residency to do that?

That's my problem with these studies. You can't just say there are going to be more diabetics, more elderly patients and more demand for foot care and then convert that into a shortage of DPMs. Mayo is literally hiring an NP/PA for $120-167k to do a bunch of what podiatrists do every day.

I want to know how much of this supposed shortage actually requires a DPM and, even more importantly, how much requires a surgically trained DPM.
 
This is exactly why I have a hard time believing these studies saying we are short 400 or so podiatrists in Florida. Are we actually short podiatrists or are we short people providing foot care?

If one of my kids was dead set on doing podiatry but didn't really care about surgery, I'd probably tell them to become an ARNP and open a general practice. PCPs and urgent care docs already treat plantar fasciitis, give injections, do matrixectomies, treat wounds, etc. Become really good at treating the foot and ankle stuff you can treat and refer out the rest.

Why spend 4 years in podiatry school and then another 3 years in a surgical residency to do that?

That's my problem with these studies. You can't just say there are going to be more diabetics, more elderly patients and more demand for foot care and then convert that into a shortage of DPMs. Mayo is literally hiring an NP/PA for $120-167k to do a bunch of what podiatrists do every day.

I want to know how much of this supposed shortage actually requires a DPM and, even more importantly, how much requires a surgically trained DPM.

Here is the existential question:

What is a podiatrist trained in 2026?
 
For nearly a year now, I've had a NP in my practice. I've written elsewhere about the pros and cons, the biggest con being it took forever for her to get credentialed on payer plans.

In terms of how she performs on the job, she's perfectly adequate. I've told my staff to schedule her with diabetic/skin problems. She can do warts and ingrowns independently.

I told her I don't want the staff scheduling her with MSK complaints more complicated than plantar fasciitis. If her patients need XR, it's a gray area in the law in my state if she can perform the radiography, but I can have the assistants do it because the assistants are operating under my partner's and my supervision. But for reading the XR I told her she needs to get a DPM involved to document that we collaborated in the patient encounter.

The problem is that you could have a new patient complaint of "painful callus" but the painful callus is secondary to a hammertoe contracture that might need to be straightened. Sure, with enough on-the-job training, a plucky NP could do tenotomies/arthroplasties in the office under local, just how I do. But as needlessly drawn out as our education is, I think it ultimately serves a purpose and it should serve our patients' benefit. So my NP has been funneling a lot of mini-surgeries onto my schedule.

Ultimately my point is that you can't wish away mid-levels. They've been pumped out assembly line style since the turn of the millennium and it was only a matter of time before they encroached into our field. What it means is how does podiatry use them to enhance our own productivity, because even a primarily office-based podiatrist can benefit from having one.
 
Here is the existential question:

What is a podiatrist trained in 2026?
I actually agree with you. I don't think someone who went through a 3 year surgical residency needs to be cutting toenails all day.

But then this brings me back to the studies saying we are short hundreds of podiatrists in Florida and thousands nationally. What exactly are we short of? Even @sdupre_apma alluded to the different set of demands that he is seeing for podiatry. He's seeing a different demand for surgery vs. toenails.

I mean it's glaringly obvious that in order to meet these different demands, there should be different training pathways. Keep the best 100 (or whatever the demand is for foot surgery) residency spots and everyone else does a 1 year in office "residency". Those without a surgical residency do not get hospital/ASC privileges for surgery. But apparently that is completely off the table.

The other option would be to just graduate 100 per year and fill the rest of the demand with NP/PA.

Or the third option, is to continue what we've been doing and saturate the market with trained foot and ankle surgeons who have no one to operate on.

If a NP/PA can do the nail care, diabetic foot exams, calluses, warts, nail avulsions, etc, how much of the projected "podiatrist shortage" actually requires a DPM and 7 years of training?

That's what I want to know before we use these studies to say we need to recruit more students and graduate 550 DPMs a year.

Maybe there really is a shortage. But demand for foot care isn't necessarily the same thing as demand for DPMs, and demand for DPMs isn't necessarily the same thing as demand for surgically trained DPMs.

If we're training everyone for 7 years to be a surgical podiatrist, but a significant portion of the projected workforce need can be handled by PCPs, NPs and PAs, I think that's something we probably need to figure out and hopefully @sdupre_apma can do that.
 
Sorry, we got bamboozled by ortho 20 years ago when we created the unified 3 year track. Up until then, their salient criticism of podiatrists was that we were a patchwork of providers with variable years of training that created confusion in the public about what we really do, so honestly how can we even trust them in the OR to handle anything more complicated than a neuroma. We responded, we decided everyone would get a 3 year surgical residency so stfu ortho. And now they're watching as a generation of DPMs overpay time and tuition to be doing most of the same podiatry we did in the 1970s.
 
Ty
There are several podiatry NP job listings where the salary is actually higher than what many podiatrists are being offered. It is honestly sad and disappointing to see where this profession is heading.

NPs already have a broader scope of practice than podiatrists in many areas, and in many states they can practice independently.

It would be an incredibly dumb decision for podiatry schools to start training NPs and PAs who could eventually compete with or replace podiatrists. But at this point, I would not even be surprised if they did it.

The schools care about enrollment, tuition, and keeping the money coming in. As long as the school stays open and everyone keeps getting their paycheck, they do not seem concerned about what happens to the job market for graduates.

The leadership of this profession does not appear to care enough about the future of young podiatrists either. If they did, there would at least be a serious discussion about limiting the number of new podiatry graduates each year based on actual workforce demand.

Instead, the strategy seems to be: keep opening seats, keep producing graduates, saturate the market, and then tell everyone the solution is another fellowship.

The more desperate new grads there are, the cheaper they become.

Great system.
Typical podiatry screwing over younger people