- Joined
- Dec 6, 2010
- Messages
- 21
- Reaction score
- 0
So, as a med student in the pre-clinical years thinking about what I want to do, I've perused many of the threads here in the EM section. A common theme that seems to crop up is the tough working environment for ED docs with non-stop shifts, etc. eventually leading older docs to want to get out. I'm assuming here, but I would think that for most of the forum (not just EM) there is a large city bias, as that's where most people train and many people live/want to live. Well, what about "rural" or small-town EM? It seems like that would help alleviate some of the issues of shifts where you just get hammered with tough cases, lots of trauma, etc. By rural/small-town I'm thinking towns of 10-75k with EDs that see probably less than 15-20k visits a year. Would this not be a better working environment (depending on the specific location obviously?). Is this what folks mean when they suggest moving to lower acuity/lower volume ED's later on in their career?
Feel free to educate me, as obviously I don't have much experience with this besides growing up in a small town. It seems like cost of living would be lower, you would still make good money, be valuable to the ED if they don't have mostly EM trained docs, and would still be able to enjoy the benefits of rural life (I'm as depressed thinking about missing spring hunting season as I am sitting in my neuroscience lectures ). Thanks!
Feel free to educate me, as obviously I don't have much experience with this besides growing up in a small town. It seems like cost of living would be lower, you would still make good money, be valuable to the ED if they don't have mostly EM trained docs, and would still be able to enjoy the benefits of rural life (I'm as depressed thinking about missing spring hunting season as I am sitting in my neuroscience lectures ). Thanks!