• Practice your interview with the new SDN AI Interview Coach. Choose a school, answer by voice or typing, and receive a personalized feedback report. Available now to all SDN members. Try the AI Interview Coach.

Sad Feres Doctrine at play

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Monty Python

Full Member
20+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
ACDF at Walter Reed resulted in postop quad. Then the patient has to deal with Feres. Sad all around.

 
ACDF at Walter Reed resulted in postop quad. Then the patient has to deal with Feres. Sad all around.


I thought Feres was already rescinded and AD members can now sue? Or is the issue here that this occurred in 2018?
 
I thought Feres was already rescinded and AD members can now sue? Or is the issue here that this occurred in 2018?

I’m not qualified to speak about current legal specifics of Feres, only that the by-line of that article from this week indicates their intention to file with SCOTUS for Feres relief.
 
Last edited:
I’m not qualified to speak about current legal specifics of Feres, only that the by-line of that article from this week indicates their intention to file with SCOTUS for Feres relief.

I'm arm-chair qualified, here in the land of SDN.


Feres v. United States - Wikipedia

Looks like NDAA 2020 changed things. It didn't completely repeal the Feres Doctrine but stated that cases (by individual active duty members) would be heard. That's a far cry from actually settle and paid out: Military Services Approving Roughly 3% of Malpractice Claims from Service Members

Now, in the case of the OP, this occurred in 2018. I guess the debate is whether the gov't will entertain claims from prior to 2020. That'll definitely open up a can of worms.
 
Last edited: