- Joined
- Aug 15, 2003
- Messages
- 28,059
- Reaction score
- 438
Yaah, you are getting defensive needlessly. Your posts on this topic are usually really long and it is difficult for me to see what you are ultimately advocating, if anything.
Do you think pathology is training too many residents? Yes or no?
If yes, what do you think we should do about it?
Short and simple.
Fair enough - but if you don't want to take the time to read it, then don't take the time to respond in a fashion that suggests you didn't. Accusing me of being needlessly defensive when you don't even read the post is lazy.
To answer your questions, yes and I don't know. It's hard to make changes because it would punish many reasonable and qualified individuals who just happened to train at lesser programs. The boards could become more rigorous in who they certify, but that also unfairly punishes those who have done the required work. I guess any solution would have to be planned, with announced program closing and number reduction. Eliminate poorer-performing programs and stop increasing spots at large programs. It's not really a short and simple problem, even if the one-word answer is, the solution is not.