- Joined
- May 15, 2007
- Messages
- 70
- Reaction score
- 0
MS4 here. I have a scenario which I hope the pros can give their opinion on.
6wk of infant comes to peds cardiology for evaluation of a murmur picked up on exam. Instructions to the parents are NPO for 4 hours prior to exam in case the cardiologist needs to do an echo, in which case there will be sedation.
Upon further questioning it is discovered that the sedation is in the form of PO chloral hydrate and performed by a "Sedation Nurse", not a CRNA or anesthesiologist. Anesthesia is not even on the floor, but is in the medical complex. When asked they say that the cardiologists are all PALS certified they do this thousands of times a year, and a crash cart is down the hall.
My questions are as follows:
1) Is it necessary to sedate a 6wk old for a TTE, why not just hold them down?
2) If you do need sedation is chloral hydrate, given by a "sedation nurse" without any formal anesthesia training, a safe choice or does it carry the same risks as other agents - aspiration, respiratory depression, etc?
Thanks
6wk of infant comes to peds cardiology for evaluation of a murmur picked up on exam. Instructions to the parents are NPO for 4 hours prior to exam in case the cardiologist needs to do an echo, in which case there will be sedation.
Upon further questioning it is discovered that the sedation is in the form of PO chloral hydrate and performed by a "Sedation Nurse", not a CRNA or anesthesiologist. Anesthesia is not even on the floor, but is in the medical complex. When asked they say that the cardiologists are all PALS certified they do this thousands of times a year, and a crash cart is down the hall.
My questions are as follows:
1) Is it necessary to sedate a 6wk old for a TTE, why not just hold them down?
2) If you do need sedation is chloral hydrate, given by a "sedation nurse" without any formal anesthesia training, a safe choice or does it carry the same risks as other agents - aspiration, respiratory depression, etc?
Thanks