- Joined
- Aug 1, 2014
- Messages
- 650
- Reaction score
- 242
Hey guys, i'm sort of in a rut:
I just had an orgo lab practical.We had to synthesize a chemical (luminol) and then see if it glew in the dark. I decided to take my time and be very slow and steady with my procedure, and I ended up taking very long. The teacher had a 5 point penalty if we were late. However, I LITERALLY finished RIGHT on time, like...I was running to my desk to...essentially finish...right when the timer ended. I was perhaps late by 30 seconds at most.
I kinda feel like my professor is mad because i'm that annoying student who tries to scrape points here and there by contesting my grades. My TA is notorious for grading the entire class like a bich, so I kind of do it on behalf of all my classmates because they all get chitty grades from the TA. She accused me of arguing with her that day, when I pretty much was just constructively and calmly asking her questions, and she snapped and told me she wasn't going to argue with me.
Now...i'm scared that i'm gonna lose those 5 points, even though it was literally at most 30 seconds over or even less. The thing is, when I was going into the room for my test to see if my chemical glowed in the dark, I overheard her talking to the previous student explaining why he ****ed up and his chemical glew for only 12-15 seconds (it had to glow for atleast 20 seconds for full credit). Meanwhile, my chemical glowed for the full 20 seconds, so I rightfully earned the full credit.
I just so happened to run into the kid today, and he told me the professor gave him full credit, even though his chemical didn't glow the entire time. Now...If I get the 5 point penalty for being like 20-30 seconds over, would it be a chitty thing for me to do to call her out and ask her why she gave the kid full credit when his chemical didn't glow the entire time. She essentially gave him 3-5 points.
Would it be chitty, or totally justified?
Cliffs:
I had a lab practical (exam) with a time limit. I finished literally exactly when the timer was done, I was just locking up my glassware, so that maybe took about 20-30 seconds after I finished.
I'm worried i'm gonna lose those points for the time limit.
Meanwhile, professor pretty much gives full credit to a kid who's chemical didn't glow for the full 20 seconds, while mine did.
Should I call her out on it?
I just had an orgo lab practical.We had to synthesize a chemical (luminol) and then see if it glew in the dark. I decided to take my time and be very slow and steady with my procedure, and I ended up taking very long. The teacher had a 5 point penalty if we were late. However, I LITERALLY finished RIGHT on time, like...I was running to my desk to...essentially finish...right when the timer ended. I was perhaps late by 30 seconds at most.
I kinda feel like my professor is mad because i'm that annoying student who tries to scrape points here and there by contesting my grades. My TA is notorious for grading the entire class like a bich, so I kind of do it on behalf of all my classmates because they all get chitty grades from the TA. She accused me of arguing with her that day, when I pretty much was just constructively and calmly asking her questions, and she snapped and told me she wasn't going to argue with me.
Now...i'm scared that i'm gonna lose those 5 points, even though it was literally at most 30 seconds over or even less. The thing is, when I was going into the room for my test to see if my chemical glowed in the dark, I overheard her talking to the previous student explaining why he ****ed up and his chemical glew for only 12-15 seconds (it had to glow for atleast 20 seconds for full credit). Meanwhile, my chemical glowed for the full 20 seconds, so I rightfully earned the full credit.
I just so happened to run into the kid today, and he told me the professor gave him full credit, even though his chemical didn't glow the entire time. Now...If I get the 5 point penalty for being like 20-30 seconds over, would it be a chitty thing for me to do to call her out and ask her why she gave the kid full credit when his chemical didn't glow the entire time. She essentially gave him 3-5 points.
Would it be chitty, or totally justified?
Cliffs:
I had a lab practical (exam) with a time limit. I finished literally exactly when the timer was done, I was just locking up my glassware, so that maybe took about 20-30 seconds after I finished.
I'm worried i'm gonna lose those points for the time limit.
Meanwhile, professor pretty much gives full credit to a kid who's chemical didn't glow for the full 20 seconds, while mine did.
Should I call her out on it?