I am really struggling to make a decision and any insight would be very much appreciated!! Sorry in advance for the complicated nature of my situation.
I worked as an EMT during school, now during my gap year I am trying to work as a scribe. I have the opportunity to work a full-time scribe job at an ER 40min-1hr away (depending on traffic), OR 2 part time scribe jobs (one outpatient, one ER) that are 10 minutes and 30 minutes away, respectively. Same pay all around (minimum wage), doing this for the experience of course. Whatever I decide, I will only be working there one year. I am trying to rack up the hours, and I need the money (it's a little but it really helps), which is why one part time job is not an option.
Full Time PROS:
-Simplicity of working one job
-Benefits (albeit pretty lame due to "experience-driven" nature of job. I was thinking benefits shouldn't be such deciding factor since it is so temporay. They offer "401K + meh health insurance after a certain period of time, but no PTO, paid vacation, any other types of insurance, or anything else.")
-Presumably more time spent with doctors (= potentially better letter of rec)
-Hospital seems nice
Full Time CONS:
-Long commute (less sleep, more money on gas + $5 toll)
-Irregular (ER) hours (e.g. 10 PM - 6 AM; 6 AM - 3 PM; 12 PM - 10 PM, some weekends.)
2 Part Times PROS:
-Short commute (more time for life stuff + sleep, less money spent)
-More stable hours (the outpatient job is 8 AM - 5 PM MWF, the other part time has the same irregular (ER) hours + weekends as the full time job, but I would only be working here 2-3 days a week.)
-Potentially freedom to work a different part time job if I find that I don't like one of them
2 Part Times CONS:
-The jobs make you sign a non-compete clause. Technically I am not supposed to be working both of these jobs at the same time. However, these are large companies that operate in many different states, and this clause does NOT apply in the state I live in (California). In California, non-competes are null and void and not enforceable. However I am still a little bit uncomfortable about signing something I would be violating, even if it is null and void.
-I don't really like the hospital at one of the part time jobs (however, I am a fan of the other hospital!)
-Presumably less time spent with doctors (=potentially worse letter of rec due to less "quality" time spent)
-Potentially more complicated balancing 2 part times?
-One of the jobs is at an outpatient clinic... would this be too boring/minimize the learning experience?
Some more context: I just got married and I have discussed all of the above with my husband. He said we can make it work either way but I am a little worried about the greater volume of irregular hours for the full time job. I feel like it would take away from some quality time with my new husband. I would be willing to make it work however, as this is a temporary position... one year isn't THAT long.
Another important note: the $ spent on gas and commuting really adds up when put in the context that I would be making minimum wage. With our dual income we can make it work but any extra $ in the bank would be great.
When it comes to the letter of rec thing, not sure if I am overthinking it. I have made a good impression on part time jobs in the past and gotten great LORs from those, so maybe I don't need to be working full time to get a good letter of rec... thoughts?
Thank you SO much to anyone who has read this wall of text. I desperately need your advice! Please let me know if anything is confusing and I will try to clarify it right away.
I worked as an EMT during school, now during my gap year I am trying to work as a scribe. I have the opportunity to work a full-time scribe job at an ER 40min-1hr away (depending on traffic), OR 2 part time scribe jobs (one outpatient, one ER) that are 10 minutes and 30 minutes away, respectively. Same pay all around (minimum wage), doing this for the experience of course. Whatever I decide, I will only be working there one year. I am trying to rack up the hours, and I need the money (it's a little but it really helps), which is why one part time job is not an option.
Full Time PROS:
-Simplicity of working one job
-Benefits (albeit pretty lame due to "experience-driven" nature of job. I was thinking benefits shouldn't be such deciding factor since it is so temporay. They offer "401K + meh health insurance after a certain period of time, but no PTO, paid vacation, any other types of insurance, or anything else.")
-Presumably more time spent with doctors (= potentially better letter of rec)
-Hospital seems nice
Full Time CONS:
-Long commute (less sleep, more money on gas + $5 toll)
-Irregular (ER) hours (e.g. 10 PM - 6 AM; 6 AM - 3 PM; 12 PM - 10 PM, some weekends.)
2 Part Times PROS:
-Short commute (more time for life stuff + sleep, less money spent)
-More stable hours (the outpatient job is 8 AM - 5 PM MWF, the other part time has the same irregular (ER) hours + weekends as the full time job, but I would only be working here 2-3 days a week.)
-Potentially freedom to work a different part time job if I find that I don't like one of them
2 Part Times CONS:
-The jobs make you sign a non-compete clause. Technically I am not supposed to be working both of these jobs at the same time. However, these are large companies that operate in many different states, and this clause does NOT apply in the state I live in (California). In California, non-competes are null and void and not enforceable. However I am still a little bit uncomfortable about signing something I would be violating, even if it is null and void.
-I don't really like the hospital at one of the part time jobs (however, I am a fan of the other hospital!)
-Presumably less time spent with doctors (=potentially worse letter of rec due to less "quality" time spent)
-Potentially more complicated balancing 2 part times?
-One of the jobs is at an outpatient clinic... would this be too boring/minimize the learning experience?
Some more context: I just got married and I have discussed all of the above with my husband. He said we can make it work either way but I am a little worried about the greater volume of irregular hours for the full time job. I feel like it would take away from some quality time with my new husband. I would be willing to make it work however, as this is a temporary position... one year isn't THAT long.
Another important note: the $ spent on gas and commuting really adds up when put in the context that I would be making minimum wage. With our dual income we can make it work but any extra $ in the bank would be great.
When it comes to the letter of rec thing, not sure if I am overthinking it. I have made a good impression on part time jobs in the past and gotten great LORs from those, so maybe I don't need to be working full time to get a good letter of rec... thoughts?
Thank you SO much to anyone who has read this wall of text. I desperately need your advice! Please let me know if anything is confusing and I will try to clarify it right away.
Last edited: