solve this question please

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

deeentist79

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Points
0
  1. Pre-Dental
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
this Gen chem question from top score is puzzling, can someone explain this?

Q: what volume of HCL was added if 20 ml of 1 M NaOH is titrated with 1 M HCl to produce a PH = 2 ???
 
this Gen chem question from top score is puzzling, can someone explain this?

Q: what volume of HCL was added if 20 ml of 1 M NaOH is titrated with 1 M HCl to produce a PH = 2 ???

20 ml of 1 M NaOH with 20 ml of 1 M HCl is a neutralization therefore pH for this will be 7. so to bring the pH down to 6 it would be to multiply by 10 -> 20 ml x 10.... 7-2 = 5. therefore it should contain 10^5 more.

20 mL x (10^5)
 
SMB is right on the neutralization part...but I think he forgot a few things.

This question is often asked, and there are a few traps you need to watch out for.

Since they're both 1 M, you'd need 20 ml of HCl to reach a pH of 7, e.g. neutral.

Here's the 1st trap: after you add 20 ml of HCl, the total volume is 40 ml. So when you do M1V1 = M2V2, the volume is no longer 20 ml.

You need to produce a pH of 2...which is a H+ concentration of....

2 = -log[H+]

[H+] = 10^(-2) = 0.01 M

So if you're adding another "x" volume IN ADDITION to the 20 ml you already added....using M1V1 = M2V2

x*1 M = (40+x) * 0.01 M

x = 0.4/0.99 = 0.409

So then add that onto the original amount that you added (20 ml) and you get 20.409 ml.
 
Last edited:
SMB is right on the neutralization part...but I think he forgot a few things.

This question is often asked, and there are a few traps you need to watch out for.

Since they're both 1 M, you'd need 20 ml of HCl to reach a pH of 7, e.g. neutral.

Here's the 1st trap: after you add 20 ml of HCl, the total volume is 40 ml. So when you do M1V1 = M2V2, the volume is no longer 20 ml.

You need to produce a pH of 2...which is a H+ concentration of....

2 = -log[H+]

[H+] = 10^(-2) = 0.01 M

So if you're adding another "x" volume IN ADDITION to the 20 ml you already added....using M1V1 = M2V2

x*1 M = (40+x) * 0.01 M

x = 0.04/0.99 = 0.0409

So then add that onto the original amount that you added (20 ml) and you get 20.0409 ml.

dam. ur right! but how did u go from: x*1 M = (40+x) * 0.01 M to x = 0.04/0.99 = 0.0409?


isn't it 0.4/0.99 + 20
 
Guess I made a mistake too, nice catch.

Edited my post.
 
Just remember, the REAL DAT has a selection of answers. You can always plug and play to see which one works IF you are in a real bind. Hehe, I remember doing that my first time. Hopefully I don't have to resort to such things tomorrow as it will burn up precious minutes. 😀
 
SMB is right on the neutralization part...but I think he forgot a few things.

This question is often asked, and there are a few traps you need to watch out for.

Since they're both 1 M, you'd need 20 ml of HCl to reach a pH of 7, e.g. neutral.

Here's the 1st trap: after you add 20 ml of HCl, the total volume is 40 ml. So when you do M1V1 = M2V2, the volume is no longer 20 ml.

You need to produce a pH of 2...which is a H+ concentration of....

2 = -log[H+]

[H+] = 10^(-2) = 0.01 M

So if you're adding another "x" volume IN ADDITION to the 20 ml you already added....using M1V1 = M2V2

x*1 M = (40+x) * 0.01 M

x = 0.4/0.99 = 0.409

So then add that onto the original amount that you added (20 ml) and you get 20.409 ml.
Instead of 1 M of HCl, what if we had 2 M of HCl? How would it affect the result?
 
Instead of 1 M of HCl, what if we had 2 M of HCl? How would it affect the result?

Uh.

Volume needed to neutralize in the beginning would be 10 ml HCl instead of 20. Plug and chug that like how I did in my post above, think it should be pretty clear.
 
Uh.

Volume needed to neutralize in the beginning would be 10 ml HCl instead of 20. Plug and chug that like how I did in my post above, think it should be pretty clear.
Thank you for the help. just checking.
 
Top Bottom