Sports Medicine Scope

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Synophrys

Full Member
5+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2018
Messages
29
Reaction score
33
Most clinics operate in conjunction with a primary care office or an ortho group. For those of you trying to consider the pathway that is best for you, I will try to explain what to look at - sorry for the length.

  1. Sports medicine fellowship is obtainable through FM, Peds, EM, PMR, Ortho
    • Ortho: 5 year residency with a 1 year fellowship. Scope is mostly surgical and purely MSK. Orthopod's get a little squeamish when an athlete talks about periods or flu like symptoms. This pathway limits the outpatient clinical aspect and makes it difficult to justify missing work to cover events. You typically don't get compensated for sideline management or training rooms. Those are purely marketing opportunities to get patients in to your surgical center.
    • EM: 3 year residency with 1 year fellowship. Scope is mostly acute injury and lacks continuity and prolonged follow up. This is great for creating shift work and sideline management skills. Sideline management typically will not pay, so its mostly volunteer. You don't get to recruit to a practice, so there is no marketing opportunity there. You can still work in an outpatient setting, but the training in residency does not focus on this clinical setting so you may feel overwhelmed by the outpatient world of documentation.
    • PMR: 4 years residency and 1 year fellowship. This is actually a great option for a balance of interventional procedural training with outpatient clinical aspects. They tend to focus on neuro and the spine a fair amount so you get extra opportunities in procedures that other specialties typically don't do. They have similar sideline issues as ortho because it is mostly a procedure based specialty. This limits the incoming revenue if you are not doing the procedures.
    • Peds: 3 year residency with 1 year fellowship. Excellent option for outpatient training and primary prevention. Continuity with teams based on developing a patient panel. Good option for becoming a team physician for point of care issues and sideline management. Scope becomes gray due to age limitations. Peds training focuses on the under 18 crowd. Sports encompasses all ages. If there is an interest in doing college level and above, you may not feel comfortable expanding your scope to handle comorbidities in an aging athlete.
    • FM: 3 year residency with 1 year fellowship. Outpatient training for all ages. Continuity care with teams and great option for sideline management. More comfortable with treating all aspects of the athlete including psych and metabolic issues. Limits ability to outpatient procedures.
  2. Now that the basics are covered, another consideration should come down to probabilities. If you want to be a surgeon, great, your decision is easy... If you want to cover sideline medicine and be a team physician, you have options. What level of involvement do you want to do? What ages do you want to treat? How fast do you want to get there? How much free time do you want? Do you want to be on call? Once you answer all those questions, consider the numbers.
    • Which pathway gives you the best odds of getting to where you want to go? Peds and FM have the most available residency spots by far. FM offers full spectrum training in all ages. Fellowship opportunities are also more plentiful in the Primary care arena.
  3. Job prospects after fellowship can be tricky. Options include Academic, Outpatient specialty, Ortho group practice, Outpatient primary, Occupational medicine, Urgent care, ED, Student Health (college), Private practice.
    • The first thing to consider is reimbursement rates. Practicing within a primary care clinic will be reimbursed at that primary specialty rate. Practicing in an ortho group or Sports Medicine specialty office will be reimbursed at a much higher specialty specific rate for the same service.
    • Urgent care and ED will be non-selective in patient population and be reimbursed based on fee for service. No garuantee of MSK injuries, but high likelihood you will see many.
    • Occupational medicine: unique specialty for work related injuries. Almost purely MSK. Visits and medical decision making are straightforward as they are limited to very specific injuries dictated by the insurance company. Paperwork can be a pain, and every note you produce is filtered through multiple lawyers and the work comp appellate board. Disability management can be a point of contention between provider and patient. If you can stomach the patient personalities this is an awesome job for purely MSK with a great work life balance.
    • Student health: College campus has unique opportunities to work with a select subset of patients. Likely the athletics would be happy to build a relationship with you for easy collaboration to get athletes in faster. Can have a relaxed schedule due to the nature of the academic calendar. Everything comes in waves. Pay is typically the lowest of all options. Minimal ability to adjust practice setting. Raises and salaries are budgeted through discussion with the student government. The students determine how much health services are worth because their tuition is what pays for it.
    • Private Practice: most freedom you can have, but also the most difficult to pull off with todays environment. You get to call all the shots, make the schedule, negotiate contracts and reimbursement schedules. If you miss a day, you don't get paid. You have to recruit your own patients and retain them.
    • Academic: best work life balance. Freedom to expand on event coverage for purposes of training new fellows. Freedom to research new modalities and treatments. Continuity with various teams and training rooms while being paid salary. Nights and weekends can be interrupted with phone calls from residents and fellows. Expected to teach so you must love that part.
  4. The end game is to produce a clinician that is comfortable handling sideline trauma, interventional outpatient procedures, and comprehensive management of the entire athlete. If this sounds like fun, Sports Medicine is likely what you are looking for. Here is a list of what a program should offer in terms of training:
    • Diagnostic ultrasound
    • Ultrasound guided procedures
    • Regenerative medicine techniques
    • Tenotomies
    • Exercise prescription
    • Fitness testing with modalities like V02 max, resting metabolic rates, C02 testing, stress testing
    • Sport Specific evaluations like golf swing analysis, throwing analysis, gait analysis
    • nutritional consultations for maximizing workouts or recovery
    • fracture management
    • Concussion management
    • ACLS/BLS
    • sideline management and event consultations
    • Physician Wellness education (you have to know how to have fun)
    • Formal didactics (not just a journal club)
    • Research Opportunities
    • Board Review help
    • Post Fellowship support network (should be able to reach out to old colleagues with questions)
  5. If anyone has any further information, or would like to add something please do so below. Also, if I have made any mistakes please feel free to point and laugh.

Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users
Sports cardio is also a cool niche and the doctors who lead parts of it are family med trained and they work alongside cardiologists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Sports cardio is also a cool niche and the doctors who lead parts of it are family med trained and they work alongside cardiologists.
Can you elaborate on sports cardio? How does one get certified/recognized in that field? Obviously IM/Cardio/sports would take super long to train for... So you just have a Cardiologist and the Sports doc work together?
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Can you elaborate on sports cardio? How does one get certified/recognized in that field? Obviously IM/Cardio/sports would take super long to train for... So you just have a Cardiologist and the Sports doc work together?
Not sure if you're certified exactly but recognized is a part of it. Look up the Seattle criteria, it's well accepted and the leading physician was a family med trained sports doc. And contributors included FM trained folks.
It's largely knowing who to screen, screening properly and ensuring unnecessary testing is not done, and then dealing with the various congenital issues. Treating is one aspect but also deciding who can and can't continue in sports is another.
 
Hello. I did my Orthopedics residency outside USA. Now I am doing family medicine residency. I would like to practice the knowledge that I have gained in all those years. Do I need to do Sports medicine fellowship as per to get the board CAQ and to practice MSK or not? I surely know most os the MSK aspects till now.
And also please elaborate in terms of getting job as a sport medicine doc.
 
Hello. I did my Orthopedics residency outside USA. Now I am doing family medicine residency. I would like to practice the knowledge that I have gained in all those years. Do I need to do Sports medicine fellowship as per to get the board CAQ and to practice MSK or not? I surely know most os the MSK aspects till now.
And also please elaborate in terms of getting job as a sport medicine doc.

I think it depends on what setting you're interested in working in. Obviously you'll never be able to do surgery in the US, but if you want to work in the same office as orthopedics, you should do a sports medicine fellowship.

Now don't quote me on this because I may be totally wrong but: If you're just practicing straight up Family Medicine, I'm pretty sure there is nothing that limits what you're able to treat from a primary-care stand point. The fellowship only makes sure you're comfortable with all the sports pathologies and treatment. But if you are "orthopedic surgeon trained"... I think you'll already know how to treat MSK pathology non-surgically and can therefore treat most non-surgical pathologies in a PCP office. Assuming you provide all your own equipment: Cortisone injections, bracing, casting, etc.
 
Do I need to do Sports medicine fellowship as per to get the board CAQ and to practice MSK or not?
And also please elaborate in terms of getting job as a sport medicine doc.

If you want to be certified by taking the Sports Med CAQ, then yes, you must do a fellowship. There is no other way around this requirement. If your goal is just to practice MSK medicine, then no. Practicing based on your knowledge is part of the primary care scope. You will only be limited by your ability and confidence in the given field. Primary care offers a very wide scope, with some office based procedural training. You can do as much or as little as you like. You can still work with sports teams and cover sideline events as a primary care doc without a fellowship. It just makes it more difficult to get the job.

Alternatively, if you are wanting to work in an orthopedic practice, it becomes a reimbursement issue. As a straight primary care doc, insurance companies do not see you as a specialist and will not reimburse the practice as such. You would then cost the practice money by not being certified. This would not effect you at all for working in other fields like ER, or occupational medicine clinics. They have a different reimbursement setup and do not rely on referrals like other outpatient clinics. They have negotiated contracts directly, and then pay you a salary based on your experience.
 
I'm curious as to how competitive sports medicine fellowships are. Are they hard to get into? What do they primarily look for in candidates?
 
I'm curious as to how competitive sports medicine fellowships are. Are they hard to get into? What do they primarily look for in candidates?
As fellowships for Family Med go they’re probably one of if not the most competitive. Programs are looking for great residents who have shown an interest/dedication in Sports Medicine. That means event coverage while in residency and med school. Sports physicals. Possibly research.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
It's getting more and more competitive every year. I would agree that it's the most competitive fellowship from FM. Last year's match had 190 programs with 298 spots. 227 of those spots were for FM, and the rest were for the other specialties. The match rate was 76%. (2019 Match data). Compare it to geriatrics, where in the 2018 fellowship match there were 387 spots, and only 174 applicants.

What does a fellowship look for in candidates? The most important thing is to be a good resident. If you're a crappy resident you're going to be a crappy fellow, and I don't want you. Also experience in sports medicine during residency. Did you do sports physicals, cover games, research, go to AMSSM. Did you put an effort in learning some MSK knowledge when you are a resident? Anyway those are the thing I look for in a good candidate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
As fellowships for Family Med go they’re probably one of if not the most competitive. Programs are looking for great residents who have shown an interest/dedication in Sports Medicine. That means event coverage while in residency and med school. Sports physicals. Possibly research.
check out the thread over here -

This should answer many of your questions.
 
Top