Standard Reduction Potential Notation?

tncekm

MS-1
10+ Year Member
Jul 18, 2006
3,608
5
  1. Medical Student
    Okay, so I saw some info with reduction potentials compared, but the notation didn't make sense to me. Maybe it was part of an equation I'm not familiar with?

    Anyway, any help is much appreciated.

    E&#8304;(Zn²&#8314;/Zn) <--- WTF is this?
     

    Kaustikos

    Antibiotics 4 Lyfe
    10+ Year Member
    Silver Member
  • Jan 18, 2008
    12,415
    4,436
    Always Bespin
    1. Fellow [Any Field]
      I can't really see what exactly those superscripts are, but I think its just:

      Eo(Zn2+/Zn)

      Which probably means, 'The standard reduction potential to convert Zn2+ to Zn'.

      That's what I was going to say. I dont' know why they'd add the standard superscripts to the elements, which would mean that it equals 0, right? The standard something of an element in its standard state is always 0....
       

      Zerconia2921

      Bring your A-game!
      10+ Year Member
      Mar 24, 2008
      207
      0
      California
      1. Pre-Pharmacy
        Okay, so I saw some info with reduction potentials compared, but the notation didn't make sense to me. Maybe it was part of an equation I'm not familiar with?

        Anyway, any help is much appreciated.

        E&#8304;(Zn²&#8314;/Zn) <--- WTF is this?


        The standard reduction potentials is E = reduction + oxdation

        For a reaction to occur there is greater potential for reduction than oxidation. Which means the more positive the E the greater chance for reduction to occur. I hope i made sense.
         
        About the Ads

        tncekm

        MS-1
        10+ Year Member
        Jul 18, 2006
        3,608
        5
        1. Medical Student
          I can't really see what exactly those superscripts are, but I think its just:

          Eo(Zn2+/Zn)

          Which probably means, 'The standard reduction potential to convert Zn2+ to Zn'.

          That's what I was going to say. I dont' know why they'd add the standard superscripts to the elements, which would mean that it equals 0, right? The standard something of an element in its standard state is always 0....
          Thanks, and yeah Vihsadas, you got the superscripts correct (I guess the characters my mac defined didn't want to show on your comp?). I've just never seen notation like that, and it kind of threw me. I'm used to seeing X+ + e- ----> X2; E=+Z V, etc.
           

          tncekm

          MS-1
          10+ Year Member
          Jul 18, 2006
          3,608
          5
          1. Medical Student
            The standard reduction potentials is E = reduction + oxdation

            For a reaction to occur there is greater potential for reduction than oxidation. Which means the more positive the E the greater chance for reduction to occur. I hope i made sense.
            Thanks, but I'm not quite following.

            I thought for a voltaic reaction to occur there just needed to be a spontaneous flow of electrons from one molecule to an atom (a reductant reduces something, and is oxidized spontaneously).

            Could you explain the E = reduction + oxidation? I thought E is just the "electromotive force", which has to do with electron movement where positive electron movement is spontaneous and negative is forced (like an electrolytic cell).
             

            Zerconia2921

            Bring your A-game!
            10+ Year Member
            Mar 24, 2008
            207
            0
            California
            1. Pre-Pharmacy
              Thanks, but I'm not quite following.

              I thought for a voltaic reaction to occur there just needed to be a spontaneous flow of electrons from one molecule to an atom (a reductant reduces something, and is oxidized spontaneously).

              Could you explain the E = reduction + oxidation? I thought E is just the "electromotive force", which has to do with electron movement where positive electron movement is spontaneous and negative is forced (like an electrolytic cell).

              E is the electromotive force or you can also have EMF which is the same.
              EMF= reduction + oxidation this equation is the difference in potentials between the two half cells.

              For a galvanic cell the EMF is positive whereas for an electrolytic cell its negative.

              For example:

              Eq. 1) Co3+ + e- --> Co2+ E = +1.82 Volts
              Eq. 2) Na+ + e- --> Na(s) E = -2.71 Volts

              The larger the potential the more likly reduction occurs. So looking at the two equations which one has the larger value?....

              Eq.1) correct its value of 1.82 Volts is > -2.71 Volts. So the total reaction will look like this:

              Co3+ + e- + Na(s) ---> Na+ + e- + Co2+

              Since we reversed equation 2 then the E value will change to a positive 2.71 volts.

              So your EMF will be 1.82 + 2.71 volts = 4.53 volts. Since our EMF is positive it shows to be a spontaneous reaction. I hope I answered your question.
               

              BerkReviewTeach

              Company Rep & Bad Singer
              Vendor
              10+ Year Member
              May 25, 2007
              3,986
              799
                Okay, so I saw some info with reduction potentials compared, but the notation didn't make sense to me. Maybe it was part of an equation I'm not familiar with?

                Anyway, any help is much appreciated.

                E&#730;(Zn&#178;/Zn) <--- WTF is this?

                It's outdated shorthand for a half-reaction, exactly as Vihsadas and Kaustikos pointed out. It goes along with cell shorthand. For an electrochemical cell, they often use shorthand such as:

                Zn|0.10 M Zn2+||0.10 M Cu2+|Cu

                I assume such a thing is present in your review materials because the author wants to expose you to as many different ways to present the material as possible.

                zerconia said:
                The standard reduction potentials is E = reduction + oxdation

                You really need to be careful in terms of terminology, because the MCAT preys on careless errors. The standard reduction potential is for a reduction HALF-reaction. It is measured as a voltage and can be referred to as an emf in terms of voltage. But it is only a half-reaction.

                What you have typed is a standard reaction potential. Ereaction = Ereduction + Eoxidation is for a full redox reaction. It's a subtle difference, but one that you can be sure an incorrect answer is based on.
                 

                TawMus

                Full Member
                10+ Year Member
                5+ Year Member
                May 18, 2008
                125
                0
                1. Resident [Any Field]
                  It's outdated shorthand for a half-reaction, exactly as Vihsadas and Kaustikos pointed out. It goes along with cell shorthand. For an electrochemical cell, they often use shorthand such as:

                  Zn|0.10 M Zn2+||0.10 M Cu2+|Cu

                  I assume such a thing is present in your review materials because the author wants to expose you to as many different ways to present the material as possible.



                  You really need to be careful in terms of terminology, because the MCAT preys on careless errors. The standard reduction potential is for a reduction HALF-reaction. It is measured as a voltage and can be referred to as an emf in terms of voltage. But it is only a half-reaction.

                  What you have typed is a standard reaction potential. Ereaction = Ereduction + Eoxidation is for a full redox reaction. It's a subtle difference, but one that you can be sure an incorrect answer is based on.


                  What is the equation for the standard reduction potential then???
                   
                  This thread is more than 13 years old.

                  Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

                  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
                  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
                  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
                  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
                  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
                  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
                  7. This thread is locked.