- Joined
- Jun 16, 2008
- Messages
- 217
- Reaction score
- 22
Our practice is looking to hire a dermatopathologist, and we wanted to know what's a competitive figure for the midwest. Can anyone help?
Our practice is looking to hire a dermatopathologist, and we wanted to know what's a competitive figure for the midwest. Can anyone help?
300k I guess.
300 sounds about right, depending on productivity.
Man I been working west and east coast you offer 300K and people will be running over themselves to take the job...
I would think $250k would be more than competitive. But it also depends on the situation and the future of the job. If it's a straight salary position where there is not much opportunity for income growth then it would probably have to be higher. But if it's a partnership track then $200k-$250k is more reasonable.
You are wrong. It's much much more than that.
There's your problem. Go work in the midwest with the OP!![]()
It depends on the practice. Those numbers are not wrong for some places I know personally. Salary is only one part of the equation so you have to be careful about presuming that a place that starts at "only $250k" is a worse job. I am not dermpath trained but the ones I know have started anywhere from less than $250k to more than $300k. Interestingly, the higher ones are often the jobs that sound less promising in the sense of their long term payoff.
I'm the OP.
We were thinking $250K for this position, just outside Chicago (about half an hour). There is not enough derm work to keep the dermpath occupied full-time, so he would also be signing out general surg path.
The position has great benefits, including paid malpractice and disability insurance, as well as $30K for the 401k (regardless of how much the associate contributes).
Vacation starts at 6 weeks. There is a $10K stipend for conferences, journals, CME, etc.
The applicant would also be eligible for partnership.
So, with benefits, compensation is above $300K for a partnership-track job.
Does that sound pretty reasonable?
I'm the OP.
We were thinking $250K for this position, just outside Chicago (about half an hour). There is not enough derm work to keep the dermpath occupied full-time, so he would also be signing out general surg path.
The position has great benefits, including paid malpractice and disability insurance, as well as $30K for the 401k (regardless of how much the associate contributes).
Vacation starts at 6 weeks. There is a $10K stipend for conferences, journals, CME, etc.
The applicant would also be eligible for partnership.
So, with benefits, compensation is above $300K for a partnership-track job.
Does that sound pretty reasonable?
So, with benefits, compensation is above $300K for a partnership-track job.
Does that sound pretty reasonable?
You are wrong. It's much much more than that.