D
deleted1139416
My school doesn’t, but a lot of people at my school are trying to set up BS research electives in their last month of 3rd year with faculty/physicians they personally know.
There's no way this is true. An exam based on content knowledge will be improved upon by knowing more content. Even if the questions make it seem like a lot of reasoning is required, at the end of the day 99% are just purely from medical knowledge on things you either learnt or didn't. It's not like the MCAT which has more reasoning that doesn't require explicit content knowledge which leads to sharp plateaus in many folk, because they just don't have the inherent ability.I think we are going to see a decent amount of over studying for Step 2. There's a point where you plateau and then potentially dip due to burnout. Be careful folks.
After taking shelf exams for a year I can't imagine most people needing more than 4-6 weeks to peak their scores
There's no way this is true. An exam based on content knowledge will be improved upon by knowing more content. Even if the questions make it seem like a lot of reasoning is required, at the end of the day 99% are just purely from medical knowledge on things you either learnt or didn't. It's not like the MCAT which has more reasoning that doesn't require explicit content knowledge which leads to sharp plateaus in many folk, because they just don't have the inherent ability.
It's theoretically finite but realistically no one has ever walked into that exam knowing everything that could be tested. I think the vast majority would improve from another month of learning, unless you're already hitting 280.I'd have to disagree here, though this is ofc just conjecture.
The content is finite. You're reviewing this stuff on your rotations for ~year, and a lot during preclinical. The dedicated time is to consolidate, work on your exam taking, and filling gaps. Sure with more time (assuming adequate rest) you can improve but you're going to hit a point where adding a month on top of it may not even improve your score percentile. This is assuming you dont have some serious gaps in knowledge.
As a very good test taker, who did better on step 2 than step 1, I disagree. There's no way another month would have lead to a better score. For precisely the reason you mention - nobody will ever walk into the test knowing everything that will be tested. No matter how many questions you do, the test writers will write questions that pertain to a topic in a different way you haven't seen before. This is where test taking strategies come in, not just knowledge base.It's theoretically finite but realistically no one has ever walked into that exam knowing everything that could be tested. I think the vast majority would improve from another month of learning, unless you're already hitting 280.
You could sharpen test taking strategies if you have more time. More time, if used wisely will lead to a better time, but that is a big "if".As a very good test taker, who did better on step 2 than step 1, I disagree. There's no way another month would have lead to a better score. For precisely the reason you mention - nobody will ever walk into the test knowing everything that will be tested. No matter how many questions you do, the test writers will write questions that pertain to a topic in a different way you haven't seen before. This is where test taking strategies come in, not just knowledge base.
That’s different than sheer knowledge base improving with extended (ie longer than typical) dedicated study periodsYou could sharpen test taking strategies if you have more time. More time, if used wisely will lead to a better time, but that is a big "if".
Similar starting point for me. I came close, high 260s.I took my first Step 2 practice exam and hit a 249 without studying a lick. Anyone with similar experience that hit a 270+ on the real deal?