Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Well, at least you're not out 100k+ in useless debt at that point. Fail step 1 twice and that is what you are facing.
-
Practice your interview with the new SDN AI Interview Coach. Choose a school, answer by voice or typing, and receive a personalized feedback report. Available now to all SDN members. Try the AI Interview Coach.
Step 1 vs MCAT
Started by Shams al Deen
Well, at least you're not out 100k+ in useless debt at that point. Fail step 1 twice and that is what you are facing.
That is true about the money. IBR would ensure you dont starve. Plus people getting Masters degrees can be in the same boat with a questionable degree, so doesnt really make for a unique hell. I bet if you ask anyone who has failed to gain acceptance to medical school in the US if they would take a gamble of 100k vs be a doctor ,a lot of people would jump on the gamble. Caribbean schools prey on the answer to this question.
This is such a bizarre argument
Would you rather trip and fall at the Olympic sprint or in the qualifiers?
*People proceed to argue about how the Olympics is the step (see what I did there) that actually matters*
Would you rather trip and fall at the Olympic sprint or in the qualifiers?
*People proceed to argue about how the Olympics is the step (see what I did there) that actually matters*
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I think the fundamental conflict in this thread is premeds who think not getting into medical school is the worst thing that could happen, while you have medical students telling you that getting in and failing out or being pigeonholed into a career you don't want because your Step 1 is crap is much worse.
There are lots of things that one could do to be successful in life. I had a career after one halfhearted, unsuccessful attempt in getting in to medical school right out of UG (MCAT wasn't the factor that kept me out either). I survived and did some other things for a while until I decided that I wanted to give it another (better) shot. I got in, but honestly, I could have kept doing the same job if things hadn't worked out. Once I got in, the pressure to stay and be successful has been greater than any pressure I felt to initially get in. The stakes are higher, because I'm committed to this path. Before I got in, there was no specific commitment. I also say this as someone who never had ambitions for a competitive specialty. How much greater the pressure is for them I can only imagine.
I appreciate your perspective, and perspective of people changes as they go through the process. I do believe that mitigation / minimization of regret is a major factor in living life. I too am going to medical school after similar circumstances as you did after having a different career. I do believe the regret of not going / getting into medical school would have been a major life dissatisfaction for me therefore the reason of giving up a cush job and career to struggle again through school. Going and failing out would mean that I will not suffer from that regret ever again, since I had atleast made it to medical school. The olympic analogy is an apt one. Plus the fact that 90%+ students in medical school in the US atleast pass the step on the first or second try goes to show the risk of failing out is real but small compared to the risk of not being admitted to medical school in the first place.
So for most people STEP is not a question of if they will go on to become a doctor, rather it is what type of doctor they can become vs not becoming a physician at all.
I think you can take step 3 times
It's waaaay higher than that. Unless you have stats in the extreme low end you have like a 98-99% chance of making it through. It makes no sense to find likelihood of failing out to be more stressful than likelihood of never getting in!
Yeah, try getting into a residency with that... Let me know how it works for you.
I am sure there is a FP clinic In North Dakota or Alaska that would take you.
pretty sure you could find some community FM residency in the middle of no where... All you have to do is pass the test... There have been multiple threads on here about people with step 1 failures who matched
It the military we had a way of characterizing risk in a severity and probability matrix. I think it helps to think about things like that.
MCAT 25 or less (first time taking) - Severity: Marginal (you can retake and recover), Probability: Occasional
= Medium risk
Step 1 failure (first time taking) - Severity: Catastrophic (your residency chances are now limited and you must pass on retake for a decent chance at any. Also you will possibly have to delay starting 3rd year and maybe take a year off). Probability: Remote
= Serious risk
Multiple failures? It happens, is it something to depend on? I wouldn't. Caribbean grads who never have to take the MCAT or get scores that are "failures" also match into residencies so neither are complete exclusions.
Not getting into medical school would be 1. CIt the military we had a way of characterizing risk in a severity and probability matrix. I think it helps to think about things like that.
MCAT 25 or less (first time taking) - Severity: Marginal (you can retake and recover), Probability: Occasional
= Medium risk
Step 1 failure (first time taking) - Severity: Catastrophic (your residency chances are now limited and you must pass on retake for a decent chance at any. Also you will possibly have to delay starting 3rd year and maybe take a year off). Probability: Remote
= Serious risk
I haven't taken the STEP 1 yet, so I can't say what's harder or easy, but not having a CARS section is a major plus
Why catastrophic severity? This is the premed mentality I'm talking about. Your life is not over if you don't get in to medical school. There are 50 million jobs out there. Some of them even don't have the high levels of depression and low job satisfaction that medicine does. Plus there is always next year. Also while getting a poor MCAT will certainly cause you to not get in to medical school, not getting in to medical school is not always caused by a poor MCAT (ie. the two are not equal) so let's compare apples to apples here, like I just did.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Haha good luck getting SDN to agree that medicine is just another job and many other things would make us just as happy
FTFY
Both require a retake and with both you could still get into residency/Med school. Do you really think one failed mcat limits your choices more than a failed step? It's an interesting question
But the people disagreeing with you right now have work experience outside of MD ! If my accepts were rescinded tomorrow it would be catastrophic to me, not just "oh well guess I'll stick with this decent gap job forever"
Calling it a "gap job" makes me question the legitimacy of your work experience. You're doing the job in between college and your application to medical school. My job was a "career" that I abandoned to attend medical school. Have you ever had a "career"?
I have. and i would consider it catastrophic failure.
Not getting in to medical school would be one for you. Not matching into a residency would be one for me. Neither one of those are were we actually comparing in this thread. We're comparing the MCAT vs. Step 1. On a single sitting, I would argue that it's evident that Step 1 has the higher stakes.
How much more than a year would I need to work a job, before I would be allowed to say I'd be unhappy with this being the closest to MD I could get?
My comment was merely a response to you minimizing @efle 's work.
That's actually the only comparison that supports you though, losing medical career now vs more catastrophically losing medical career + saddled with debt.
A reasonable comparison of doing somewhat poorly or mediocre on each totally changes the answer. Then it's no/unlikely MD vs limited specialty choice, and most of us would prefer the latter.
Sorry, it's silly to make that determination on my part. But my point would be that you can't know that you would be completely unhappy doing anything but medicine as you have not really attempted to do anything besides prepare for medical school. I will withdraw that part of my argument, but I will also state that there's a reason why ADCOM ask questions like what would you do if you could not do medicine. I got asked it during residency interviews and I had the obvious answer of my previous career, but I also had another answer that was a little more quirky and conversational.
If you do mediocre on the MCAT you can retake it and do better and get in to medical school and excel. You cannot do the same on Step 1. You are forever determined by your score. Your only redemption is doing better on Step 2, but still there are many doors/careers closed to you.
If we changed the question to importance of Step 1 vs MCAT (average of first 3 attempts--not any 1 single attempt). Would that change your MCAT severity rating? I'd put it at 2C-Serious.It the military we had a way of characterizing risk in a severity and probability matrix. I think it helps to think about things like that.
MCAT 25 or less (first time taking) - Severity: Marginal (you can retake and recover), Probability: Occasional
= Medium risk
Step 1 failure (first time taking) - Severity: Catastrophic (your residency chances are now limited and you must pass on retake for a decent chance at any. Also you will possibly have to delay starting 3rd year and maybe take a year off). Probability: Remote
= Serious risk
Oh I agree with this, it's not like I'd jump off a building if I had to work in science or engineering or something.
I should rephrase then. There's a great deal of data (in AAMC publications) that significant improvement from, say, 24 up to highly competitive ranges is exceedingly rare.
So it's finding out you are very unlikely to ever get the MD, vs finding out you are even more unlikely to match competitive specialties. I'd still much prefer the latter.
Think of it this way - if you could offer someone a guaranteed medical school spot as long as they signed away their ability to match to the most competitive specialties, do you think you'd struggle to find takers?
You keep comparing oranges to apples. Compare the MCAT to Step 1, not the medical school admissions process as a whole to Step 1.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
It's not at all, it's a very straightforward comparison of consequences for a weak MCAT vs a weak Step 1. No MD vs gotta aim at accessible specialties. Many, many people would love to accept the latter to jump over the former.
Which honestly you never even disagreed with above, your whole bit was about which is worse to do catastrophically, horribly bad on to a degree only a few percent of the barely admitted people do.
Which honestly you never even disagreed with above, your whole bit was about which is worse to do catastrophically, horribly bad on to a degree only a few percent of the barely admitted people do.
A weak MCAT, you retake and do better. A weak Step 1, you change the course of your career potentially. You also can forget any of the nice academic residencies in the desirable cities even in a non competitive residency. I just applied with a Step 1 comfortably above the average for an noncompetitive specialty. I didn't even get interviews as an MD at any of the top tier residencies where I applied. Just because most people are successful doesn't mean that it's as easy as you think.
Anyway, I think we've hit our point where neither is going convince the other. Come back after you've taken Step 1 and seen what it means for your future and let me know where your perspective is then.
i wouldn't be surprised if @efle handily demolishes Step 1 and still maintains his opinions.
I always thought efle was female.
B
Beezlebub
Steps b/c PDs care more about their lunch than your MCAT
Again, that's not reality according to the AAMC dataset. Just because you imagine it easy for most people to jump a bunch of points on a retake doesn't mean it is!
Anyways I think there's an easy way to put it that is pretty objective: The consequences for being at the middle of the curve are worse for MCAT. The consequences for being way at the far left failing tail are worse for Step.
Me either, because how I did on the MCAT has nothing to do with my opinion of the consequences for a mediocre or weak score.
It's the ****ing "elf" thing isn't it
B
Beezlebub
What kind of BS assessment is this? Just b/c someone doesn't excel on a particular test doesn't mean they can't become a good physician. There are multitude of factors involved. This sort of arrogance and lack of insight is an embarrassment to the medical community.
you are arguing against something else that's irrelevant to the topic at hand
B
Beezlebub
Topic is essentially comparing apples and oranges. Irrelevant either way.
not really. and even if it is, there is no reason to derail it by arguing on something else entirely.
I love when threads get derailed by arguments about derailing the thread
B
Beezlebub
"For example, if one wants to go into IM, which exam is higher stakes? I would argue that it is the MCAT."
Case closed.
Someone can't take a joke.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
B
Beezlebub
No, please don't.
It's okay. I still love you. All the best with STEP 1 result, I'm sure you did fine. Many people feel nervous afterwards, but a lot of them usually rock it.
he crushed both Step 1 and MCAT.
i still feel the Step 1 test taker pool is smarter and more prepared than the MCAT test taker pool
B
Beezlebub
Yea, I thought this was a recent thread and he didn't update his post No. 1. Congrats to him. Smarter is indeterminate, but more hardworking is definitive b/c med school naturally conditions students to have better work ethics and time management, which ultimately improves academic performance.
Why is smarter indeterminate?
B
Beezlebub
Some guy with crazy hair that changed the world said it best: "Everybody is a Genius. But If You Judge a Fish by Its Ability to Climb a Tree, It Will Live Its Whole Life Believing that It is Stupid"
