- Joined
- Dec 31, 2007
- Messages
- 1,373
- Reaction score
- 25
Which one would you prefer?
I don't really think it makes a huge difference. Sure, in theory, learning all about the anatomy/physio/micro/everything else of the kidney just sounds right. Why would you do it anyway else?
But when you get your schedule and there's all of these random classes that really fit into no system (ie all of immunology, genetics, etc) you see that the systems curriculum isn't really as clear cut and pretty as you'd think.
Are there any other approaches out there besides these two?
So is system based really less stressful/less time in class than the traditional one?
So is system based really less stressful/less time in class than the traditional one?
I'd imagine that all that matters is fit: conceptual "big picture" thinkers would tend to favor systems, whereas details/facts-oriented types would tend to favor a traditional subject-based curriculum.
I know I've just invited a hail of stones upon myself but that's my opinion 😎.
well, i'm not sure why you think system-based involves less details/facts.
Those are either schools that just say they're "system-based" or "integrated". You need to find schools that have an actual integrated curriculum.