Supervisory role
Started by Piebaldi
You aren't ready to supervise.
I do want to know why. PM me?
Not in pain - in general PM&R. Not sure why you'd say that?
Been following your threads.
Oh please.
I would never remotely supervise anyone unless it was someone I had already been supervising in person for years and trusted with my license. Even then it still sounds like a bad idea.
You are probably correct.
That fact that it is not already apparent to you makes me question your judgement. At the same time maybe you are underestimating the risk and exposure to legal issues.
I'm simply trying to understand what happened to YOU in particular. i am well aware of legal risks.
Nothing in particular to me. But I am well aware of the risks. At least when there is direct supervision I have control over the patients.
www.ama-assn.org
More physicians being sued by patients they’ve never treated
Do doctors ever have “legal duty of care” in such cases? An AMA education session explored the issue.
www.ama-assn.org
Nothing in particular to me. But I am well aware of the risks. At least when there is direct supervision I have control over the patients.
More physicians being sued by patients they’ve never treated
Do doctors ever have “legal duty of care” in such cases? An AMA education session explored the issue.
Yes I am aware that these cases exist. It is also shocking though that if the NP practices independently or can - even if they don't have admitting priviledges, that the physician wold be sued.
