TBR Bio Vs TPR Bio

[capnamerica]

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

Do you guys think that TBR Bio has more material than TPR Bio? I looked through my TPR Bio book a while back and the amount of material honestly scared me compared to EK Bio. So, now that I have the TBR books, I was wondering if it is worth reading TBR Bio for anything other than their passages. Any suggestions?

 

[apc]

Do you guys think that TBR Bio has more material than TPR Bio? I looked through my TPR Bio book a while back and the amount of material honestly scared me compared to EK Bio. So, now that I have the TBR books, I was wondering if it is worth reading TBR Bio for anything other than their passages. Any suggestions?

I was wondering the same thing.
Some of their (TBR) passages (such as the biochem ones) are super hard, so I wanted to know if the material is covered in their books.

 

[FollowTheMoney]

Yeah, TBR is super detailed to the point where it is overkill and not going to help you remember what is truly important for the MCAT. I would use it as a supplement at the most, but people definitely like their passages. If your getting anywhere from 50-60% on their bio passages you're in good shape. They are THAT hard so don't be alarmed. TPRH Bio is what I use aside from EK and it isn't that much more detailed, trust me.

 

[SN2ed]

Stick with BR for its passages. For content review, EK Bio works well. If you need more detail, go with TPRH. It sounds like EK Bio is probably the better fit.

 

[capnamerica]

Okay. Thank you!