• Set Yourself Up For Success Webinar

    October 6, 2021 at 2 PM Eastern/11 AM Pacific
    SDN and Osmosis are teaming up to help you get set up for success this school year! We'll be covering study tips, healthy habits, and meeting mentors.

    Register Now!

  • Funniest Story on the Job Contest Starts Now!

    Contest starts now and ends September 27th. Winner will receive a special user banner and $10 Amazon Gift card!

  • Site Updates Coming Next Week

    Site updates are coming next week on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Click the button below to learn more!


Telemedicine and the impact on fellowship training?


Full Member
10+ Year Member
Sep 12, 2008
Wondering what other onc clinics are doing with regards to telemedicine and fellowship training. Do you have a three way call/video with the fellow, attending, and patient ? This makes the most sense practically but seems like it would render the fellow with more of a “shadowing” role. Do you have the fellow call patient first, staff with attending, and then call patient back with plan? This fits the more traditional role but is inefficient. Do fellows/attendings typically work from home or do they just work from clinic ?
Also how long does your clinic/hospital plan on utilizing telemedicine ? Is this a permanent path forward ? What patients will you or do you still see in clinic?
Last edited:


Full Member
7+ Year Member
Mar 12, 2013
  1. Fellow [Any Field]
This is completely dependent on Attending. I've spoken to patients using each of of the scenarios you describe. I think going forward, prevalence of disease will dictate how long we do telemed. Some places are already seeing physical patients again with hospital precautions in place. Anyone on chemo needs a close eye, Surveillance patients, not so much.
About the Ads


No Meat, No Treat
Staff member
Volunteer Staff
15+ Year Member
Mar 6, 2005
  1. Attending Physician
I imagine insurances are going to stop reimbursing for telehealth at some point and that will be that.
They won't stop. You've been able to bill for virtual visits/phone visits for a long time. But it won't be at the "in-person" rate. When that happens is TBD of course.


Full Member
10+ Year Member
May 1, 2010
Mostly did telehealth visits by speaking to the patient, then hanging up (asking the patient to "hang out" in the virtual exam room) to precept with attending (over the phone), and then joining together on a three-way call. It's definitely more work for the attending, but this is essentially the same as the previous staffing model.

IMO telehealth is great for patients on surveillance or gen heme clinic. Don't need to wait for the patients to be roomed and vital'd. I often would even call the patients ahead of time and then breeze through an entire afternoon of clinic in 2-3 hours. You can't do that with physical visits (also in person I think patients in general tend to linger, chat, and also bring up unrelated issues).

Sure, the physical exam is sacrificed and I can think of many cancer patients on active chemo where it's dangerous to go months-years without a physical evaluation, but lets not kid ourselves that the physical exam is of utmost importance in a specialty like heme-onc. The vast, vast majority of gen heme clinic can be done as telehealth, and more efficient too this way (can get through more new patients). I'm actually glad in a sense that COVID was last nudge that really pushed medicine into incorporating more technology in outpatient visits (old system driven by outmoded insurance payment models).

Mostly now we're seeing active therapy patients in the clinic in person, and then pushing all surveillance/stable established regimen patients to e-visits (for onc). Gen heme is almost completely virtual. Mal heme is about the same as oncology. For better or for worse, telehealth is there to stay. I think clinic will remain partially in-person and partially virtual forever (for example, you can alternate e-visits and in-person visits for most patients). Just like Apple when they decided to get rid of the headphone jack -- there's going to be an uproar and people throwing hissy fits about it, but this too shall pass and become the new normal.
About the Ads
This thread is more than 1 year old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.