- Joined
- Apr 3, 2005
- Messages
- 4,992
- Reaction score
- 9
- Points
- 4,646
- Location
- Far away from my pillow -_-
- Resident [Any Field]


juniper456 said:what do you think? should i stay here and compulsively check amcas or go out??

juniper456 said:i'm supposed to go out with some friends tonight, but i don't know if i can drag myself away from this ****ing computer!!
what do you think? should i stay here and compulsively check amcas or go out?? if i go out i won't be back until 12 or 1 AM, and by that time the scores might have been out for a couple of hours!!!
![]()
rain1_rain1 said:Bud Light? Coors Light? Miller Light? Natural Light? Busch Light? Michelob Light? Keystone Light? Millwaukee's Best Light? Miller Genuine Light? Budweiser? Bud Ice? Amber Rock? Bacardi? Corona?
ANYONE ????????????![]()
![]()
gujuDoc said:I'll take some Schmirnoff please.![]()
doctorjoy said:![]()
Try to have a peaceful sleep tonight
![]()
![]()
Dr.Giggles said:I already told my parents about my bad score.
rain1_rain1 said:top smirnoff with bacardi vodka, you'll get the best kick! last time i took it before checking my scores from organic exam, i misstook 41 for 91, euphoric, i drank the bottle of vodka straight and passed out 😀 now don't ask me how I felt next day![]()
![]()
![]()
Nish
ChuckRock said:Does anyone else get some sick pleasure repeatedly checking for scores, knowing that along with your fellow pre-meds, you are taxing AMCAS resources and costing them money? I feel like its payback for all the money I'll get screwed out of in this process. Yea, I know its pretty passive agressive.
gujuDoc said:WHAT???????????? What if its good????? What are you gonna tell them?? That you were bluffing in case you didn't get a good score????
Be confident and try to hang in there.
I know its hard. I've been a nervous wreck since we had the message come up saying the 16th was the day of reckoning.
ChuckRock said:I was refering to the bandwidth costs and the additional support costs associated with preventing the servers going down when they suddenly get 10,000 pre-meds checking their scores every minute for a couple hours.
hoberto said:Did anyone notice that the examinee data for the April 2005 test is up?!!
http://www.aamc.org/students/mcat/examineedata/table0405.pdf
Proof that they have these suckers done. Does it take this long to load 28,764 sets of scores??
And 0.0% got a 15 on verbal.
gujuDoc said:Oh ok. I think those costs are probably like nothing to them with all the money they have.
I think this process really needs to become cheaper somehow. I can understand interviews being expensive, because flights and hotel stays. But application fees, pointless secondaries that are expansions or reiterations of what they already know from primaries, etc. could really be reduced. That would be awesome. Unfortunately, such will probably never be the case. So I guess we move on and accept it as the fact that we'll be making money that makes the price of the process seem like it was nothing for the end result and great journey learned along the way.
hoberto said:Did anyone notice that the examinee data for the April 2005 test is up?!!
http://www.aamc.org/students/mcat/examineedata/table0405.pdf
Proof that they have these suckers done. Does it take this long to load 28,764 sets of scores??
And 0.0% got a 15 on verbal.
hoberto said:I realize that. It's more interesting that they have all the data available but no scores for us. We are more important than the examinee tables, darn it! 🙂
Dr.Giggles said:Did anyone notice the PS was graded brutally this year a 10 was 70 percentile, meaning only 30% of test takers got 10 or higher.
hoberto said:I realize that. It's more interesting that they have all the data available but no scores for us. We are more important than the examinee tables, darn it! 🙂
Dr.Giggles said:Did anyone notice the PS was graded brutally this year a 10 was 70 percentile, meaning only 30% of test takers got 10 or higher.
Dr.Giggles said:Did anyone notice the PS was graded brutally this year a 10 was 70 percentile, meaning only 30% of test takers got 10 or higher.
That sucks - why don't they give us our scores!!!!! 😡hoberto said:I realize that. It's more interesting that they have all the data available but no scores for us. We are more important than the examinee tables, darn it! 🙂
tigress said:Isn't that how it usually is? I mean I haven't gone back and compared these tables to the older ones, but they look about the same to me.
Taty said:it all probably means that we going to get our scores in a couple of hours....
i feel sick....
rain1_rain1 said:could be couple of minutes... ready get set go ...mcat is running towards all of us ... from some f****ng place/planet called AAMC!
junebuguf said:Bio is different. The histogram is noticeably flattened and the curve is more lenient in this administration. The other two sections have the same percentiles from last year, so the curve is no different.

hoberto said:Did anyone notice that the examinee data for the April 2005 test is up?!!
http://www.aamc.org/students/mcat/examineedata/table0405.pdf
Proof that they have these suckers done. Does it take this long to load 28,764 sets of scores??
And 0.0% got a 15 on verbal.
rain1_rain1 said:could be couple of minutes... ready get set go ...mcat is running towards all of us ... from some f****ng place/planet called AAMC!
juniper456 said:is this true?? could they really be coming out any minute now??
tigress said:A more lenient curve on bio would be my dream come true. I've said it so many times that people here are probably sick of it, but my BS was a killer with 5 hard orgo passages, so the possibility of a nice curve gives me some hope![]()

juniper456 said:when did this go up?? was it only a few minutes ago?
gujuDoc said:who knows. But apparently, hoberto is paying attention and found it up. On the main page, it still says for the 2004 results and graphs, click here. But if you click that link for 2004, the 2005 stuff is up. So scores will be up by 12am, I am guessing.