OK. Last time I'm gonna say this, because every time I say this, I'm cutting my own throat by downplaying critics.
Here's Jetproppilot's response to the CA-3 comment (
aside: jet has been in this business for nearly ten years, and jet heard the same worries when he emerged from residency in 1996)
OK, HERES MY OFFICIAL, SERIOUS RESPONSE:
THERE IT IS. JET'S OFFICIAL RESPONSE TO ANESTHESIA "DYING" FOR DOCTORS.
concerned resident: "Jet, why the laugh-avatar response?"
JET: "Anesthesia sites keep proliferating. GI docs want us to cover their site for UGIs, LGIs, ERCPs. Rad-onc doctors want us to keep their kids still so they can
zap the tumors. Cardiologists want us in their suite for their lengthy-EP studies. ICUs/ERs want us available for "difficult" intubations. CT/MRI sites want us."
"OK, ALL PERIPHERAL SITES, WE'LL JUST CLOSE DOWN THE OR SO WE CAN ACCOMODATE EVERYONE'S NEEDS!!!

"
Bottom line, the request for anesthesia FAR exceeds current anesthesia-provider supply.
At our hospital, we routinely, because of anesthesia-provider paucity (and lack of payment for said procedure) tell GI docs, cardiologists, scared ER docs, and rad-onc docs that we just dont have enough to go around.
And ya know what the result of that is gonna be?
Hospitals, most of which are big-money-corporate companies, will augment anesthesia groups monetarily.
Think about it.
Hospitals are no more than.....
SLUM LORDS. They "rent" space for patients, procedures, operations, etc.
THEIR ENTIRE EXISTANCE IS DEPENDENT ON
DOCTORS , RIGHT???
I mean, without doctors, who attract, admit, and treat patients, there is no business. And thats what hospitals are looking for. Business. Patients. Money. Sorry to burst your bubble, medical philanthropists, but thats where its at. C-notes.
Back to anesthesia....
YOU CAN'T PROVIDE A QUALITY ANESTHESIA SERVICE IN A METROPOLITAN AREA WITHOUT ANESTHESIOLOGISTS.
So heres a translation:
Your (slum-lord) hospital wants to attract Rad-Onc physicians, who are gonna bring big-paying patients to your hospital for treatment, and, by the way, said rad-onc docs want the anesthesia service to cover their cases, BUT, anesthesia docs arent reimbursed well for said-procedure?
Guess what.
If said-hospital is smart, they'll keep their anesthesia docs happy with ample monetary
augmentation so they can keep the cancer-patients coming to their
(slum-lord) hospital.
Bottom line??????
Their is a
HUGE demand for our services.
Procedure not well reimbursed from an anesthesia perspective???
No problem, if you have business savvy, and recognize the importance of your services, and recognize people/companies are making BIG CASH off said provided-procedures/services.
You may not get paid by well by medicare by providing anesthesia for some procedure, but if the (
slum-lord) hospital you practice in is smart, they'll make you happy monetarily, so they can keep the patient-pipeline coming.
Is my viewpoint cynical??
Yes.
Does my viewpoint protect my "portion" of the cash, when in fact, the hospital is making big-bucks off procedures that pay my group pennies????
ALSO YES.
Agin, bottom line, there is a HUGE demand for anesthesia and a SHORT SUPPLY of providers.
And that problem is not gonna be fixed overnight.