- Joined
- Mar 25, 2007
- Messages
- 196
- Reaction score
- 1
I was having a discussion with a few residents today about general surgery. My question was whether there were any 'true' general surgeons out there anymore. Most believe that gen surg has been marginalized by rapid sprouting of surgical sub-specialties. And except in small communities that are hurting for sub-specialized docs, most general surgeons are pretty limited in the types of procedures that they can do.
Whatever the reasons are for this shifting trends (HMOs, individual income, etc...), it seems that general surgeons simply do not have the jurisdiction and authority that they once did. They are mostly limited to abdominal procedures, which in itself has also been subdivided by other subspecialized surgeons (hepatobiliary, colorectal, etc...). As a general surgeon, I would hate to see some CT surgeon taking my Ivor Lewis procedure 🙁.
Perhaps the last 'true' general surgeons are those in the field of critical care/trauma or ones that work in smaller communities? Any thoughts?
Whatever the reasons are for this shifting trends (HMOs, individual income, etc...), it seems that general surgeons simply do not have the jurisdiction and authority that they once did. They are mostly limited to abdominal procedures, which in itself has also been subdivided by other subspecialized surgeons (hepatobiliary, colorectal, etc...). As a general surgeon, I would hate to see some CT surgeon taking my Ivor Lewis procedure 🙁.
Perhaps the last 'true' general surgeons are those in the field of critical care/trauma or ones that work in smaller communities? Any thoughts?