The test was legitimately as hard as any of the AAMCs (always mostly doable passages with one WTF passage). Might of been harder for certain people because they were weaker in certain areas, but from taking this test alone, it was extremely, extremely comparable to AAMC 10/11.
AAMC Average - 36
PS (13-15): For the most part, was pretty doable - a lot math questions than I expected and probably most worried for those because of stupid mistakes. I think this section played to my strengths fairly well. Also, I could of swore I've seen one of the discretes in another practice book. I can't really say much else about this part cause all my physics/chemistry knowledge cleared from my mind gearing into verbal.
VR (7-12): I have no idea how I did on this section. The readings themselves were not difficult (most of them, comparable to AAMC 10), and I felt like I understood 6/7 pretty well but there were several questions where two of the answers sounded just as good. Either way, I somehow manage to get 9s on every practice AAMC, so I expect around there.
BS (12-15): Again, as everyone has suggested, was pretty doable. The only thing I am worried about is a bad curve because of this. I know my friend who took the test a month ago thought he failed PS and destroyed BS and ended up getting 13 on PS and 10 on BS (most likely due to stupid mistakes + bad curve). For me, this section was a little tougher than the PS though since there were definitely a few discretes that I had to use strong educated guesses; these guesses, again, might be the difference between full points on the section with a bad curve.
Overall, though, I think a lot of these reactions on SDN are a little over-exaggerated, and you guys probably did a lot better than you think. The fact that on AAMC practice tests give you your score right away (which does not give you time to lament over your how badly you did) as opposed to waiting a month for it probably has a lot to do with this.