hey guys i still havent gotten a phone call. and my status is still under review...does this mean its time to move on?
Since interviewers are the ones calling, as it was on December 3rd (and 4th... and 5th...) then I think we should give it until the end of the day tomorrow before making any definitive statements about things being over. UNC isn't usually one to update AADSAS very promptly, so I think Seahawk's experience in December was more of a fluke than something any of us should expect (as far as statuses still saying "Under review"). Hopefully more of us will hear soon.
just got the call from the dentist that i interviewed with. good luck!
My AADSAS updated. Denied.
Congrats to those who got in.
My AADSAS updated. Denied.
Congrats to those who got in.
Declined. I am dying, I can't believe this, my interview went stellar. This is horrible.
I was denied too!!! I thought my interview went well, but who knows. Does anyone know who to contact about how to improve your application for next year??
sorry for the confusion... left my accnt signed in and my roommate thought he would have some fun... rejection here.
I just logged onto my AADSAS account and saw that I have been wait listed. Does anyone know how many people are on it? or when I could expect to hear back? also, is it bad to call the school and ask those things?
I get the impression that your interviewers are not on the adcom and furthermore cannot do much more than give you an interview score. I was literally told by all my interviewers that I would make a great addition to the school and they hoped to see me again. Then to not even get waitlisted????? Wonder what the point of the interviews even are?
I get the impression that your interviewers are not on the adcom and furthermore cannot do much more than give you an interview score. I was literally told by all my interviewers that I would make a great addition to the school and they hoped to see me again. Then to not even get waitlisted????? Wonder what the point of the interviews even are?
From what I understand, the interviewers first give you a score. From these scores, the interviewers compare you to the other 8 or so students they interviewed. When the ADCOM meets, if your interviewer liked you, they will vouch for you and try to get votes from everyone else on the committee. Unfortunately, even though everyone is qualified, they cannot vouch for everyone they interview.
You are 100% correct. I had the process explained by my interviewer today. Did you know that the student body then votes?? Or something to this effect. Both of my interviewers vouched for me and I still got denied!
I unfortunately was not accepted this cycle. I emailed Dr. Wilder on Thursday to see if I could meet to go over my application and ways to improve it some time, but I have not heard back from him. I've contacted him via email a couple times before and he was usually very good about getting back but I still have not heard anything. Just wondering if anyone else has emailed him about this type of thing and if you've heard anything? Also, should I email anyone else if I haven't heard from him soon?
I unfortunately was not accepted this cycle. I emailed Dr. Wilder on Thursday to see if I could meet to go over my application and ways to improve it some time, but I have not heard back from him. I've contacted him via email a couple times before and he was usually very good about getting back but I still have not heard anything. Just wondering if anyone else has emailed him about this type of thing and if you've heard anything? Also, should I email anyone else if I haven't heard from him soon?
You are 100% correct. I had the process explained by my interviewer today. Did you know that the student body then votes?? Or something to this effect. Both of my interviewers vouched for me and I still got denied!
As far as I know, this is not accurate.
You are interviewed by 3 interviewers. They get together on the day of the interviews and talk about it. Then, a meeting occurs later where all the interviewers (minus some of the student interviewers) get together and select the first pool of acceptances (around late November). Then, after the January interview date, they meet again and select the last acceptances from the whole pool of interiewees.
That's it. Each applicant's complete application is considered along with his/her interviews, etc.
I was wait listed last year and accepted this year. I had a friend who had the same thing happen the year before, so I'm giving a combination of my advice and his. If you have additional references, it will only help to have those sent on your behalf - the sooner the better (in paper or by email or both). As far as the # of people on the list - this is information they do not divulge, so don't even ask. I was told the number has historically been between 2 and - if I remember correctly - 7 or 9 at the most that are actually offered a seat from the wait list. But, there are no guarantees. The number this year may be zero or higher than in the past. Making it on the list basically means that you were of the caliber they are looking for and barely missed the cut. As far as being given an offer, the latest they have ever done it was on the second or third day of classes (in August) when a student couldn't continue in the program any longer (for personal reasons). So, there is no magic date that you should have in your mind. For your sanity, your best move is to forget about the wait list and do whatever you can to improve your application for next year so that you will be above the cut. Also, apply earlier than everybody else - don't miss a beat! Early on in the spring, after everything has died down (give Dr. Wilder a break for a little while!), try to set up a meeting to come in to speak with Dr. Wilder and see if you can find out how you can improve your application. For me, it was retaking the DAT and increasing my shadowing hours. He is very kind, helpful, and easy to talk to. The things that to you stand out the most as having room for improvement, I would go ahead and start working on now. Then, you can tell him how you are improving your application, which also makes you look better should a seat open up (my understanding is that they reconsider each student on the wait list as opposed to having a ranked order of wait listed students they work through). Just show him what you are doing and ask if there are any other areas he would suggest improving on.I just logged onto my AADSAS account and saw that I have been wait listed. Does anyone know how many people are on it? or when I could expect to hear back? also, is it bad to call the school and ask those things?
Bottom Line is that by the time you get to interviews most candidates possess equal combinations of DATs, GPAs, and shadowing or experience to be virtually identical. If not, they shouldn't have been interviewed. Why waste everyone's time? We must trust that the university is being prudent in those standards?
The wild card is the interview where different groups of interviewers interpret your credentials, demeanor, and platform skills and then provide an interview score. There is objectivity for candidates where the questions and the reviewers are the same in interviewee comparisons. There is subjectivity where you were in a group that faced a different set of interviewers yet somehow the selection process attempts to standardize your score relative to someone who had a differerent panel of interviewers? Interviews by their nature are subjective, even when dealing with the same interviewer.
Just like interviewing for a job or overtrivializing and being judged in a beauty contest or political decision, many qualified candidates are rejected. Not because they couldn't be dentists but because it comes down to the numbers - only so many can be accepted and the interview cutoff criterion are, at best, perceptions. Some go on to be accepted in future years; some are accepted elsewhere and others never realize their dream though they were qualified. The truth is that many of today's interviewers and practicing dentists don't have the credentials of many of you and others who weren't afforded interviews?
The objective criterion make qualifying highly competitive and the subjective criterion (interviews) have no basis for standardization. You may not even face the same questions, certainly not the same interviewers. You will never make sense of the process as it will never be published and heresay and guesses will only frustrate you. If you qualified to interview then you are as good as any that have been accepted and quite a few who are practicing dentists (the historical student profiles prove that). I know that's no consolation but its the best I have to offer.
As far as the # of people on the list - this is information they do not divulge, so don't even ask. I was told the number has historically been between 2 and - if I remember correctly - 7 or 9 at the most that are actually offered a seat from the wait list. But, there are no guarantees. The number this year may be zero or higher than in the past.
Actually this isn't true. I met with Dr. Wilder last week and directly asked him this question...he looked through some documents for a minute or so and indicated the waitlist is approximately 30 people this year, but that it differs year to year. Yeah I know, I was very surprised as well.
Question about background check after acceptance. After I have completed and passed the application station background check sent to me via email after I was accepted, do I only need to "release that information" or do I need to actually "distribute the report"? I just assumed that simply releasing the information would get it to UNC but I wanted to double check. Thanks!
As far as I know, this is not accurate.
You are interviewed by 3 interviewers. They get together on the day of the interviews and talk about it. Then, a meeting occurs later where all the interviewers (minus some of the student interviewers) get together and select the first pool of acceptances (around late November). Then, after the January interview date, they meet again and select the last acceptances from the whole pool of interiewees.
That's it. Each applicant's complete application is considered along with his/her interviews, etc.
1 - Agreed.According to Dr. Everett: 1.) The interviewers are on the adcom. 2) The student who interviewed you is also part of the adcom when voting is concerned. 3) Your interviewers vouch for you if they like you. 4) Other members of the adcom who did not interview you cast a vote along with your interviewers.
Sorry if that student body thing was vague, I know it sounded like students were just willy nilly casting votes. The 4 items above are a fact confirmed by Dr. Wilder and Dr. Everett.
HEY! every1 just wanted to say that yay I am an OOS and I got accepted! I interviewed in late January and got that amazing phone call like 3-4 weeks later! I thank God for it all. As of right now I think I am definitely going to UNC. I just wanted to connect with other ppl of the 2017 class. I am soo excited to meet every1😳😀😀![]()
Hey everyone. I had a question about the immunization and medical forms for incoming first years. I went to UNC for undergrad and graduated in 2012, meaning I was not required to complete a online immunization form for UNC (since I am in the two year window). I did however have to get a couple of vaccines in order to get everything up to NC state standards. However, I was curious if I needed to get all of my updated immunization information from general campus health office over the Foretta Davis at the school of dentistry or if we only are required to send over the additional school of dentistry requirements by July 20th? The only reason I ask is because the wording in the acceptance pack seemed a little vague to me and I was unsure. Thanks!