The pre-op diet - does it matter?

Started by seewell
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

seewell

Junior Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Did anyone read this article in Anesthesiology?

Proponents of liberalized fasting guidelines.
by Cook-Sather SD, Nicolson SC, Schreiner MS, Maxwell LG, Park JJ, Gallagher PR, Cohen DE
Anesthesiology 2005 Jan;102(1):236-7; author reply 238

I'd love to hear your thoughts.
 
Current NPO guidlines are nothing more than a medical-legal document. There is very poor data on when the stomach is empty, and when gastric contents will lead to aspiration.

I advocate CT scan or ultrasound to evaluate for gastric emptying.
 
I read it and all I remember is thinking how confused the patients and nurses (our pre-op nurses give the NPO instructions the day b/4 surgery) will be if we allow them to eat some things and not others. I tried to allow oral intake with my patients but it just confuses them and the nurses so much that I have gone back to nothing after midnight. The pts always went too far. Or they thought it was just a form of torture and that it didn't really matter if they ate a Big Mac on the way to the hosp. I frequently would say, well lets just do the case and my partners would say not for 6 hours and others would cancel. The surgeons were confused, the patients were confused and the nurses. It ended up being the most common reason to be called to the per-op clininc. Its just not worth it. If you ask me our society could skip a few more meals as well. I don't remember the study per-se but I think this covers what I got out of it.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Noyac said:
I read it and all I remember is thinking how confused the patients and nurses QUOTE]

Yes, I agree... The article came onto my radar after reading a similar review at an on-line journal club
http://journalreview.org/view_pubmed_article.php?pmid=15618812&specialty_id=2

"There is fact... there is science... there is theory... and there are lawyers. Is anyone willing to take this chance even if science supports it??"

I was thinking of posting a review too.. but wanted to get some feedback first. Thanks!
 
seewell said:
Noyac said:
I read it and all I remember is thinking how confused the patients and nurses QUOTE]

Yes, I agree... The article came onto my radar after reading a similar review at an on-line journal club
http://journalreview.org/view_pubmed_article.php?pmid=15618812&specialty_id=2

"There is fact... there is science... there is theory... and there are lawyers. Is anyone willing to take this chance even if science supports it??"

I was thinking of posting a review too.. but wanted to get some feedback first. Thanks!

Yes- I am willing to take the risk. Many years ago in British study was shown that light meal may be better than NPO for 8 hrs. A clear liquids clear in minutes not hrs. That is known from 1800's. In children we only wait 2 -3 hrs for clear liquids and they are a more risk for aspiration than adults-(in gneral) .
So for inteliigent pt I will accept 2 hrs for clear liquids but where I work the rule is MN because people are too stupid to differentiate between apple juice and a BIg MAC ( supersized of course)
 
adleyinga said:
seewell said:
Yes- I am willing to take the risk. Many years ago in British study was shown that light meal may be better than NPO for 8 hrs. A clear liquids clear in minutes not hrs. That is known from 1800's. In children we only wait 2 -3 hrs for clear liquids and they are a more risk for aspiration than adults-(in gneral) .
So for inteliigent pt I will accept 2 hrs for clear liquids but where I work the rule is MN because people are too stupid to differentiate between apple juice and a BIg MAC ( supersized of course)

The Brits have it all figured out. Heck, their attendings even have a beer with lunch. 👍

But then again they dont have sleezy personal injury lawyers filing incessant frivolous lawsuits. 👎
 
jetproppilot said:
adleyinga said:
The Brits have it all figured out. Heck, their attendings even have a beer with lunch. 👍

But then again they dont have sleezy personal injury lawyers filing incessant frivolous lawsuits. 👎

I agree. Lawyers are destroying this great nation of ours.